4deceit.htm                KEY  Page Changes 4 July 2009

JOIN

the Community On Line and work with others for the challenges that can lead to open and shut cases for crime against humanity, through the exposures you can help put together in the public domain. Work for the common good with other victims / genuine challengers. There exist too many actors of the calibre and mentality of the actor who abused trust and misrepresented himself for far too long. Read the letter (below) text on the right and draw your own conclusions as to the minefields within the courts and ancillary services that are managed by the creators of CIUKU Enterprises. Link [*L] to  Information

Attention is drawn to the words of Jesus Christ, attributed to Him by the editors of the New Testament; also to the Gospel of St. Luke, the words directed to the lawyers some 1700 years ago. Many the dignitaries over the centuries who shared the same views & opinions.
*Link [*L] to the words
*Link [*L] to the plans for the sons of men / planet earth by the Evil ones.

Below an explicit email to Mr Norman Scarth of the LIPS, in July 2000.
XXX lost reference
Link to background info

The letter sent by Mr Norman Scarth to Mr Andrew Yiannides WAS USED TO CREATE THIS PAGE. It was posted by the wily one after he attempted, with his chums, for the umpteenth time, to impose his and his associates evil ways on Mr Andrew Yiannides, of human-rights.

Fair comment and some of the facts and activities that Mr Scarth conveniently failed to consider while composing his letter are pointed to in the main window on the right. Note please the Reservations for their EXIST AND AROSE OTHER ISSUES, that should AND WILL BE REVEALED as developments dictate.

BELOW the creme de la creme.

One solicitor to another "Oh, no, we do not want an offer from you for the damages you caused to our client. We expect of the taxpayers to make good the damages AND OUR CLIENT AGREES WITH US. He decided to join 'the fraudsters club' for the usual operations through the courts. We can all (the legal circles) point him to our victims, just as we pointed Mr. Hussein, the one who initiated him, Mr Johan M R Foenander to our system of operations.

Let the above realities be a lesson to non-legal Members of Parliament and to other charlatans whose plans are to cash in / use the system as is just like the fraudsters club recruits we name in our pages.

The letter below relates to the fact that the Department of Trade & Industry were asked to address the issue of ONE POINT SIX BILLION POUNDS STERLING deficit by the Solicitors Indemnity Fund (SIF). [*Link to a most important issue relevant to the role of the SIF - F]
Visitors should read it and consider the implications WHEN SOLICITORS actually engage in blunt and arrogant fraud.
Page1

Page2

Consider the assertions and promotions by officers of the DTI. Ask, " WHY was / is the SIF allowed to carry on 'trading', by the financial institutions"?  More often than not they work hand in hand with the legal circles when THEY ARE DEFRAUDING 'the serfs' of their properties care of and through reciprocal arrangements, VIA ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES.
(*Links to cases)  

Below Evidence that persons named in our pages are fully aware of the fact that they are indulging in the free for all that is instigated and managed by and through the courts. In short THEY ARE ALL engaged in the rampant fraud on the taxpayers through abuse of the courts' facilities while promoting crocodile tears for the naive they target and they are pointed to by others who so engage too.

Page1

Page2

Page3

PROMOTIONS for the serfs & subjects to the usual false scenarios & scripts:-

The media promoting a cause for Summonsing Mr Geoffrey Scriven to court. At the time Johan Michael Foenander, a pro-active fraudsters club recruit set about 'creating a bundle of documents for promotion as evidence to be used 'in case attempts were  afoot to declare Mr G Scriven a 'Vexatious Litigant'. Most interesting the assertion in view of the fact that such a facility IS THE PLOY used by and for persons who go for the double fraud on the taxpayers arrangements in place. Convenient 'orders' to excuse & justify (to the naive and gullible) the silence of the accessories and abettors to the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts
For an insight into the minds of such persons as the LIPS crowd/mob fraudsters club recruits READ the letter from Mr Johan Michael Richard Foenander to Mr Geoffrey Harold Scriven above.(*Link)

Page CHANGES   - List
CHANGES on 29-Nov-06 List
Tape Recorders in court Norman Discovers a report Norman CAUGHT, had lied 
Important Footnotes 5 & 6

2nd batch

3rd batch

IN THIS PANEL WE PROPOSE TO ADD LINKS POINTING TO OTHER SITES  THAT LINK TO THIS WEB-SITE

Facebookers can connect with the creator of this website IF victims of the abused court & police facilities from within any pseudodemocracy Access the creator at .com/yiandrew
IF proactive OR wishing to expose & challenge the offenders

As part of the reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been implemented, the improved / amended pages are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@

   The FACTS STATED IN THIS PAGE SHOULD AWAKE all thinking and concerned 'humans' to the realities that caused Andrew, the founder of *human-rights* (NGO), to conclude that charlatans and stooges, such as Norman Scarth and his soul-mates from within the LIPS Crowd/mob, also their affiliates & associates who operate out of similar set-ups, ARE THE RELIABLE MORTAR USED by the builders of such states where RAMPANT FRAUD & CORRUPTION rule supreme.
   Artificially created states are but the building blocks used by the master craftsmen who specialise in such creations [*access footnote F1]. Arrogant pseudo-experts / pseudo-challengers [*Link to lists] SIMPLY OPERATE, from within, the system AS IS', one and all promoting one another as alleged legal gurus, yet simply accomplished lover-converts to it all as we cover in explicit pages, such as this page.
   Below we point to and publish evidence qualifying the fact that a number of alleged victims of the legal circles, persons who assert and proclaim themselves to be challenging the abusers of the courts facilities, conveniently failed to consider the invitation they received from us as covered with the supporting evidence in this page; refer to the proof of posting cards*. [*Link]
   Needless to say the fallen, were not prepared to CHALLENGE the abusers of the courts facilities, having elected to rub shoulders with them for pecuniary advantage & gains from the usual abuse of the courts facilities, as covered in the explicit page where we relate the parts, the activities and the convenient defaults and omissions of such a person. [*Link]

VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002*.     The last after conversion to lover and maintenance engineer of the system of operations he engaged with one Lou(is) / Lew(is) Foley in an inexcusable application to the R.C.J in respect of a DEAD / STRUCK OUT ACTION without appealing the Order from a Master at the R.C.J who ordered the Strike Out. [*Link from here to the page where we cover the aforesaid scenario and other conscious parts of the said Johan Michael Richard Foenander. HE FAILED TO EVER CONSIDER (like all of his soul-mates) HIS OBLIGATIONS TO SOCIETY UNDER ARTICLE 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, linked to from here]  .

*Access from here the material facts and the realities linked to from the updates page to specific elements and evidence 

• On the left image of a letter Andrew received from Mr. Norman Scarth, the Honorary and presumed honourable Secretary of the LIPS crowd/mob. He, like many others, had been and for years was, benefiting from assistance and from the mutual co-operation that existed as of the time when he met with Andrew Yiannides (the founder of human-rights) in the George pub opposite the Royal Courts of Justice, in The Strand, London.

*Link from here to an example in the left margin

• Below the text of his letter in HTML for links to & From.
  With breaks / entries for comments and observation in this colour & font in respect of his deceitful and evil ways as a typical 'lover-convert to the rampant constructive frauds ongoing through abuse of the courts' facilities', AFTER ADOPTING THE NEW WORLD ORDER CODE OF ETHICS.

*Link from here to states of morality that pre-existed the introduction of the vile ways born of the promotions attached to the most vile of works ever to have been misrepresented to mankind by the creators, their successors and the followers of the vile work

Doc. Ref: `AY-12-Oct-03

To Mr. Andrew Yiannides.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
LONDON XXXXXXXXX

Sunday 12th October 2003

Dear Andrew.
I am greatly indebted to you for many things, most recently that you took the great trouble to journey to Leeds for the hearing which was supposed to take place on 25^th June, & deeply regret that it was a wasted journey for you. However, I am hurt beyond belief that you should blame it on me.
Thank you for acknowledging the assistance you benefited from over the years, but, WHY ignore the liberty you took with my work and the instructions you gave to one of your chums, outside, to abuse the copy of the letter you received for specific use only? WHY secure a copy from me under false pretences? (*F10). Norman, it was the third and last time you indulged yourself with my work for 'your plans and those of the fraudsters club you joined forces with', years ago. You were fully aware of the fact that I objected and object to their evil plans 'as lovers and pro-active operatives' of the 'double constructive frauds' on the taxpayers'. Worse still why deface the copy of the letter you set about to abuse for your evil plans? Did I ever deface or abuse anything you contributed or did I ever WILFULLY write off any of your 'positive' work? [NOTE: The abuser of trust NEVER challenged the above as not true. Use this *Link from here to access part of a transcript, from a recorded telephone call* instigated by one of his partners in 'use of the victims their group was /  is targeting for more of the same 'under the table frauds on the taxpayers : the serfs who are kept in the dark care of such fraudsters and the media barons (through the Intellectual Prostitutes the barons retain and maintain to simply spin many a fraudulent misrepresentation to the ill-educated 'serfs', the sons of men. Marvel at the conniving fraudsters (note plural) double talk. Note ALSO Mr Scarth's reference to Andrew wasting his knowledge, [*Link to] in Mr. Scarth's opinion, merely because Andrew Yiannides declined all invitations and did not fall to all of their evil ways to entrap him as part of THEIR PLANS & WAYS TO USE VICTIMS OF THE LEGAL CIRCLES FOR THE CASH UNDER THE TABLE FACILITY* [*Link], they all fell in love with.

Caged & defenceless, I am the mercy of those totally without mercy. To give you the true picture, I enclose a copy of my document to Judge Grenfell asking for the Committal of those who deliberately kept me from the court. Also asking for an Order for compensation for you & for me.
Comment RESERVED >>> Some simple questions added in August 2010:- "Who receive and open ALL communications in the institution where you were 'caged' Mr Scarth, and WHO inspect ALL communications before going out from the institution??? How can anyone promote what I was reading here without considering the simple issue of WHICH OF THE CO-OPERATING PARTIES in the instance at hand failed to arrange for the transport that was most 'conveniently NOT made available for transfer to the venue for the day, IF NOT BOTH PARTIES??? Who did NOT FAIL to arrange for me to attend the hearings at Sheffield Crown Court earlier, in the saga I had been following with interest, especially without failing to NOTE & OBSERVE MORE THAN ENOUGH OF THE CONVENIENT FAILURES within Sheffield Crown Court, such as the RECKLESS FAILURE of the judge who DID NOT comply with the request BY THE JURY FOREMAN (the Jury), to have sight of the evidence you kept speaking of, yet failing to produce it.... EVEN AFTER I PROVIDED THE COURT CLERK, YOURSELF and your chum Patrick Cullinane who, on your instructions, collected me from London, and took me all the way to Bradford, and from there, every day was driving us all the way to Sheffield Crown Court and back to Bradford after each day's theatrics??? >> Caged & Defenceless but conveniently failing to produce the evidence the JURY ASKED TO HAVE SIGHT OF??? 

I have little hope of either. but at least it is on the record &, for all the wrong he has done me in the past, Grenfell might for once prove he has a conscience. Pigs might fly!
Comment RESERVED, but one element raises questions, such as : 'WHICH RECORDS NORMAN?' 'WHERE ARE THE RECORDS?' 'Are the evil activities you engage in, not just subjected to (as you promote) recorded anywhere in the public domain for the taxpayers to have ACCESS TO?'

As you will see, far from being responsible for your wasted journey, I was the greatest victim of the horrendous trickery of prison staff. The case having already been deliberately delayed for two years by the court the last thing I needed was more delay. I cannot survive much longer under the unrelenting & escalating mental torture along with physical brutality!
I sent a letter to you care of the prison authorities and forwarded it to 'the other maintenance engineers who love the system as is'. That was not enough for them, they relentlessly interfered and interfere in the background with the work for human-rights. YOU KNOW DARN WELL THAT YOU AGREED TO BE PARTY TO THE OBSTRUCTIONS & YOU WERE CO-OPERATING WITH SUCH PERSONS, because of 'your own love for the double constructive frauds on the taxpayers, through the courts' as an accomplished fraudsters club recruit. You know that your chum Johan Michael Richard Foenander failed to draw Roz Kellett in the 'inner circle' of  'fraudsters club recruits' BUT WE BOTH KNOW THAT YOU SUCCEEDED TO ENROL HER AS PART OF YOUR OPERATIONS after attempting to demean and abuse my work because of your evil plans for it and for the two politicians who had and have more guts between the two of them than the hundreds of charlatans you were/are rubbing shoulders with, as 'lovers of the system as is'. Ah, what a few quid and a bit of silver does! [*Link to the root of the ploys and facilities in place for using such morons in order to create the societies planned-for by the evil ones who dropped in on 'the sons of men who would be prone to the ways of the evil ones].

ALL we victims are under great pressure, & it is surprising that we retain any sanity at all. The greatest present we can make to the villains is to fall out among ourselves. With your talents & experience, you have much to give. So have I. if I can only survive the fiendish tricks they play on me. Apart from the evidence of corrupt judges, I now have great knowledge of the depravity of the Prison Service. That is why the monsters are determined I will never get out alive.
Is it not far too late now Norman? Where was your thinking cap when you were entertaining the invitation from the gurus and advisers of the LIPS crowd/mob, when they offered to make you the Honorary (that's a laugh) Secretary of 'that beehive of fraudsters club recruits' & 'lovers of the system as is', just 'sold to the pieces of silver' that Oliver Cromwell spoke of when he addressed 'the deputies of the people' before sending them packing? Better still, WHY DID YOU IGNORE the message conveyed loud and clear in the copy of the affidavit you received way back in 1997? 

Much overdue, but welcome nevertheless is Sir David Ramsbotham's new book `Prisongate', exposing some of the horror. Extracts were in The Times {Sunday & Daily) for 4 days from Sunday 28^th Sept. In the Sunday Times TV magazine section of 5^th Oct. there is an article by Sir Stephen Tumim (another sacked from being HM Chief Inspector Prisons for being too honest!). The latter contains the words of Winston Churchill, saying that the measure of a civilisation is the way it treats prisoners.
Comment RESERVED.

Whatever wrong I may have done you in the past, I BEG of you that we forget our differences, & fight on together. With our different talents, together we could be a great team. Separate, we are easy to destroy.
I recollect you writing to Roger Jones that I was the most honourable person you ever met. Can I say the same about you AFTER DISCOVERING how you entertained the invitation in 1999 (by the LIPS fraudsters club managers/controllers and their guru?) And what of your persistent failures to act as you had falsely undertaken to execute FOR human rights (the rights of the citizens) while you were benefiting from work by human-rights, used FOR YOUR PERSONAL PLANS ONLY. And all the while you were party to the conversion to legal costs of a property that was targeted! You even secured assistance from a victim of such practices, in your attempts to abuse my work, remember? The aforesaid victim, with his sister and brothers lost the whole of the legacy their father left FOR THEM, to the legal circles, exactly what was at work in the case of the property WILLED by an uncle to a nephew, the property YOU TARGETED. Why did you not disclose, to me, ALL of the events on the relevant Sunday? WHY not proceed with presentation of the copies that I submitted to the court FOR THE JURY TO HAVE SIGHT OF, as they asked through the foreman, on the second day I was attending the trial 'as you arranged with Patrick Cullinane? EVEN BETTER, why was it so organised that I was not to be in court (apprehended by the police, allegedly, because of the letters you sent to many third parties) whereby the summing up was not to be for me to hear? And WHY did YOU ARRANGE WITH THE FRAUDSTER Carolyn Marsden FOR NO TRANSCRIPTS OF THE TRIAL TO BE AVAILABLE FOR ME TO PERUSE, while I was creating a web-site for you, to benefit from? The irony of it all was that I was busy at challenging and exposing the killer whales and the sharks and ignoring the sprats of your mentality, just greedy for greens and a name for yourself  AND NEVER MIND THE MILLIONS OF VICTIMS WORLD-WIDE in pseudo-democracies, as far as you and the rest of the maintenance engineers of 'the system as is' you were/are rubbing shoulders with, are concerned! Why look at and  seek use of the victims of the legal circles and the courts ONLY FOR THE FRAUDULENTLY  CREATED  CONVERSION OF TAXPAYERS CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE BUDGET FOR REWARDS TO PERSONS  YOU TARGET  & COERCE TO  AGREE TO KEEP IT ALL UNDER THEIR HATS - while chasing STOLEN FUNDS with and for such used illiterates in law or downright greedy morons who are ENCOURAGED BY PERSONS OF YOUR MENTALITY TO IGNORE THE LAW, just as the legal circles indulge? 

There is something which you could do for me, if you would please? You may recall that I used to make a point of asking permission to use a tape recorder in court, sometimes for myself sometimes when acting as Mackenzie Friend. Sometimes permission was refused, sometimes granted - notably by Lord Woolf, who even had my second machine on the bench in front of him - he pressing the buttons! (*F)
Comment RESERVED initially. FACTS for the public domain added in December 2005:  Why  fail to state  how and who first pointed you to your rights , in the  pub 'The George' across The R.C.J?  Also how to use two recorders?  For the record also, '"is your memory so bad nowadays that you forgot that it was a case of pointing you to Hansard and what the Attorney General stated at the time when Sections of the act that covered such matters were being debated?   Quoting directly:  "I emphasise that there is no question of intending to suppress the use of tape-recorders. There is no objection in principle to it. I have made it clear that I believe that there are many occasions when counsel, solicitors, the parties and certain members of the public with an interest in the actionable proceedings should properly be allowed to use tape-recorders. I hope that the courts will be flexible, particularly if there is no official note of the proceedings .....".  The  Attorney General went on to say that he understood  that the Heads of Division would be prepared to issue a Practice Direction inviting the Judiciary in proper cases to treat applications to use tape-recorders in court sympathetically ... (Commons Hansard .... enough  pointed to. Sorry but I do not agree with or for illiterates in law, fraudsters, to be engaging in more of the same, JUST FOR THE CARROT AT THE END OF THE TUNNEL FOR ASSES OF YOUR MENTALITY and contempt for the law, in particular yours and the attitude of your affiliates to the taxpayers. [*Link [*L] to an example when the bench at the Court of Appeal was caused to reconsider its attitude towards the citizen's right to secure unadulterated recording of the day's proceedings. Family division and Lady Butler Sloss in the chair. However the actress who was sent along to abuse Mr Yiannides' time, CONVENIENTLY DEFAULTED to transcribe the recorded proceedings / hearing. She simply proceeded to ENGAGE IN MORE USE OF LEGAL AID FUNDED REPRESENTATION in and for more theatrical productions (through solicitors and barristers) in order to lead to more blank cheques (false instruments & costs orders). Such activities as intended for theft of family silver via the arrangements in place for REWARDING FRAUDSTERS of the mentality of the alleged victim of the legal circles and the courts. Just like Mr Johan Michael Richard Foenander engaged in, with Lou Foley earlier, when he DID NOT APPEAL the striking out of the case against the solicitors...... naturally because he HAD ALREADY NEGOTIATED A SETTLEMENT through the ECoHR (as his solicitors wrote to another solicitor) FOR THE PLANNED DISTRIBUTION of the funds stolen from the taxpayers contributions. Everything care of fraudulent court proceedings / theatrical production in courts and the use of FALSE instruments = court orders lacking accountability by the authors, the judges].

I had found the authority in The White Book. I believe it was in the Practice Directions Section, & seem to think it was PD 274 or something like that. I did photo copy the page, giving copies to various people. If you could find it, & send 2 or 3 copies, I would be most grateful. Not likely to be much use to me in here, but there are others who could benefit from knowing of it.
Norman, AFTER casting my nets and baiting my hooks the last stooge and fraudsters club recruit, Mrs Veronica Beryl Foden, from Plymouth, was caught at it. She benefited from a very relevant precedent case THAT ESTABLISHES VERY IMPORTANT ELEMENTS that could have been used in Geoffrey Scriven's Vexatious Litigant Order - case. It was not referred to Geoffrey, however, for I had determined that Johan Michael Richard Foenander & Eva Adshead had given the game away with the material they prepared, AS A SMOKE SCREEN for what was to come; I determined that I ought to wait and see if I had assumed wrongly. As it was, I had not and even the case that I took on board AND OF WHICH YOU WERE FULLY INFORMED, established HOW the ALTERNATIVE ALLEGATIONS that were being promoted in the media, about Geoffrey, COULD HAVE BEEN SUCCESSFULLY CHALLENGED (*F5). A Vexatious Litigant Order IS THE PERFECT COVER for keeping mum, however, great for 'fraudsters club recruits'. We both know that he took the dive and that the theatrical production in February 2000 was but a sick joke. We also know what Johan Michael Richard Foenander's mission to Australia was for, subsequently. Furthermore we know WHICH OTHER PERSONS HE ACTED FOR, too. WITH Beryl Veronica Foden passing on information (the relevant precedent case) to other 'fraudsters club recruits' the end of the road was reached. As far as the LIPS crowd / mob you are working with and for, it has been nothing but 'SIMPLY FOR MORE OF THE SAME' : I did not publish and I am not exposing 'the double constructive frauds on the taxpayers' for a joke. Fraudsters of your mentality to the 'serfs', as those you have been working with, and for, appear to be treating the victims of the legal circles and the courts, as nothing else but an avenue for more of the same (cash under the table) and such activities are no joke. SORRY, my principles do not permit me to work with or for fraudsters. [*Link below to additional realities about the activities of lovers and users of 'the system as is'].

Hate to ask you, but I am seriously `disabled' in here. As you know, my brother Jack suffers from intermittent depression, but even when well (as he is now), he is not familiar with that sort of work. If you are short of money - & you certainly must be (*F6). I may be able to get Jack to send you a few quid.
You seam to be well prepared and or informed. However, I set out many years ago VERY WELL PREPARED too. My research included and includes the element USED WHEN YOU ENTERTAINED THE INVITATION from the gurus / boffins directing the fraudulent activities FOR & BY THE LIPS crowd/mob. I have released the evidence, dating back to the 3rd century BC and you should access it SINCE YOU HAVE USE OF YOUR COMPUTER and programmes. (Refer to scanned image of the letter in the left margin/window). IT COVERS THE ELEMENT USED when 'the evil ones' were inviting one of 'the sons of men' not to co-operate with any other 'son of men' BUT TO ACT AS ONE OF THEM, instead. I recollect you telling me that you discovered God, after you went / moved to Bradford! Which God Norman? The one whose agents / followers / disciples told you to ignore the work FOR human rights and WHAT I, Andrew, STOOD & STAND FOR?

I enclose copies of documents 'ChCon-lOctO3' (to Grenfell), my letter to the Home Secretary. (`HoSec29SeptO3A') & 'GB2003'. I would again be grateful if you could send me 2 copies of them (not the last one)

Best wishes

THE LATEST: Wolds Prison gave me a surprise treat for my 78 birthday! On a trumped up charge, they dragged me (literally) to the Punishment Block! (Only three of them this time - not SIX as before! No handcuffs this time either - they must be getting kind hearted!)

779 words

On the same date the above to Mr Perry De Falconer - Hastings - Sussex & the  below to Miss Rae Huntley Post Rest -Tavistock - Devon

73 victims (!) / maintenance engineers  of the system   defaulted to respond or take any interest in the petition.

Below, images of the documents sent to the LIPS crowd / mob; others were handed copies.

• The 3 images of envelopes on the left are of 76 that were posted to members of the LIPS crowd / mob. The three were returned because the recipients had moved on or failed to collect their mail from Post office boxes.
• Not one of the other 73 recipients bothered to complete a simple A4 form (printed both sides) and return it with simple answers & input from each 'allegedly concerned' victim of the legal circles / courts.
• The input requested was relative to the right to benefit from genuinely Open Court Hearings AND THE RIGHT OF PARTIES TO MAKE AUDIO RECORDINGS OF HEARINGS & PROCEEDINGS.
• The author of the letter in this page, Mr Norman Scarth, also benefited from copies of the invitations, but as a person who was otherwise engaged and committed HE HAD NO TIME FOR SUCH TRIVIALITIES. Amazingly six years on he entertained new notions for abuse and waste of Mr Yiannides' time and goodwill to victims of the legal circles and the abused facilities of the courts. 
• Visitors, readers and researchers can draw their own conclusions as to Mr Scarth's real aims as an allegedly concerned citizen.
• One only has to consider the fact that Mr Scarth and his affiliates are busy using other victims of the legal circles / courts, in order 'to benefit from the constructive frauds on Mr & Mrs Average, as we cover in the exclusive page which he and all of his associates & affiliates elected to ignore as if it is a page covering non events or of activities that are of no interest to alleged victim / challengers of the abused courts facilities.
• ALL failing to consider the fact that they were/are exposing themselves as lovers of it all and as arrogant fraudsters through their reckless DEFAULTS & FAILURES TO REPORT THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES they *may have been victims of* YET participating in as lovers of the system, as is. DILIGENT REFERENCE to Mr Scarth's request and for what alleged use, the requested assistance WHILE FAILING TO CONSIDER one simple element: *Why not point his partners in fraud on the taxpayers where they could secure copies of his success, as guided by us and as he was granted license to create with the consent and participation of the Court of Appeal?* [*Link to the evidence Mr Scarth could point to and ask his associates / affiliates to print & use when challenging obstructions to record hearings in ALL lower courts]

Visitors to this page can access below reproduction of the documents that were enclosed in the 76 postings. Visitors, readers and researchers can then determine WHY THE PETITION to the European Commission for Human Rights was of no interest to the LIPS crowd/mob. The group were recognised by us to be simply lovers and aspiring users of the system as is. All raring and ready to go use victims of the legal circles as the Hussein fellow was sent along and used Johan Michael Richard Foenander, of whose parts and activities, as a 'fraudsters club recruit', we have released more than enough evidence. Visitors can work out the real reasons why Mr Scarth requested 'for material which his affiliates could use as part of their tools for impressive theatrical presentations in the courts for the benefit of targeted victims and those being used for more of the same constructive FRAUDS ON THE TAXPAYERS & BLUNT CORRUPTION OF MORONS who approve of and endorse the criminal activities, we expose in the exclusive page /confraud.htm

• The top image, on the right, is copy of the letter inviting each of the 76 members of the Litigants In Person Society, to co-operate and complete the two page document (copy of which further down) and return it to Andrew Yiannides at the address given in the postings.
• The image below it is copy of the letter posted to the European Commission of Human Rights. The last paragraph of the letter should clarify to visitors, readers and researchers WHY NOT ONE OF THE RECIPIENTS, took any interest in the submissions to the court.
• The LIPS crowd/mob each and every one we had contacted in person. Their leading 'lights', their managers and their advisers had established through their activities, their failures and defaults', 'most convenient', as in the instance at hand, that they did not wish for any changes in the practices, of the legal circles and the activities, more SPECIFICALLY, IN & THROUGH THE COURTS.
• Read of the promotions through the media (see Footnote after reading the material in the left margin - G2 Guardian article 'Case of the week' and the 'star's contribution for the occasion' to the right of the article), as stated and covered in the left margin window. (*Link to more information about the theatrical production at the R.C.J when the star was declared a Vexatious Litigant. Read from the paragraph the link points to and note the promotions in the media, the activities and subsequent failures by 'well informed and prepared insiders'. Do not overlook the simple fact that we recognised what in reality was to be; just another theatrical production for the usual dust in your eyes 'serfs', suckers).
• Read, in this page an explicit letter from one solicitor to another and our observation on its content (*Link to left margin / panel / window). Read in the page /2lipstalk.htm the explicit letter from one victim come-fraudsters club recruit to another, and grasp the understanding of the author, relevant to the activities of the solicitors and what he referred to as money laundering through the courts, after he secured a copy of and read the Guide to the Conduct of Solicitors. In the meantime, he elected to shove in the dark corner of his mind the fact that he HAD ENGAGED in the distribution of 'reward funds' through deployment / retainer of yet another firm of solicitors who DID NOTHING ABOUT THE PROBLEMS he was writing of and about in the letter which he intended to be used as nothing else but dust in your eyes, suckers. [*Link from here to the content in HTML format for links to & from text]

On the left copies of both sides of the A4 request that was included in all 76 posted invitations, to members of the LIPS crowd/mob. Other victims & contacts were handed copies. [*Link from here to proof of postings evidence : Among the recipients one Dr Michael Pelling (FnF light) & one Barry Worrall (UKMM light)]

Information and contributions sought relevant to hearings behind closed doors, the improprieties leading to the production of 'edited transcripts & reckless suppression of activities and realities that go on within the courts'. All complaining about such practices YET HAPPY TO PARTAKE in theatrical productions, as was the case in February 2000, before two Lord Justices for the issue of a S42 Order, in the Divorce Industry case of Mr. Geoffrey H Scriven. [*Link from here to proof of actually cut and spliced magnetic tape(s) recordings. *Link from here to challenges in another Divorce Industry case as indulged & created through the courts for the Rape of Justice, CIUKU Enterprises style].

Below them, an image of *Barrister's Opinion* in respect of issues that arose out of an assault which the police FAILED TO PROSECUTE as part of their invisible services to criminals and the activities that are organised by the controllers and managers of CIUKU Enterprises. [*Link from here to the page where we publish evidence]. The visitor's, reader's attention is drawn to the words, 'Mr Yiannides' articulate presentation', as Barrister opined when settling the opinion, image of which  we   . And we have had to put up with 'fraudsters club recruits' and their vile promotions & opinions in respect of the work we publish in these pages. Significantly not one of them EVER DARED TO ADDRESS THE ISSUES THEY WERE POINTED TO. They could have done so collectively, each one alone or with help and assistance from the gurus they rely upon in order to offend or insult Mr Yiannides' integrity, intelligence and honour. One gets accustomed to such performances from persons who endorsed, approve of and are in love with the operations organised by CIUKU Enterprises managers.

On the right we publish images of the A4 sheet (printed both sides) that constituted and represent the concept and ideas behind 'The CAMILA Project'.

When the persons fronting the LIPS crowd/mob first contacted Mr Andrew Yiannides they asserted and alleged that one of their members had passed copy of the flyer to them and that the member had, apparently, been given a flyer by Mr Yiannides in the course of a chance meeting at the Royal Courts of Justice. The promotion by the managers of the crowd/mob soon after an explicit appeal [*Link] had been lodged at Bow County Court in May 1992. The assertion was way out because Mr Yiannides had not visited the RCJ at the time when the unspecified LIPS member quoted. It was months later, for and in the case of the constructive frauds that were organised by and through doctors, Social Services, solicitors and the courts, in the case of two  parasites, the fraud of a brother Mr. Constantine Kyriacou Joannides and another alleged Christian Orthodox, the woman he married Stella Nicola Trypofti.

NOTE: We will release evidence relative to the fact that in May 1998 the United Kingdom Men's Movement (UKMM) contacted Mr Yiannides, out of the blue. Their 'leading lights', interestingly, used 'The CAMILA Project, address for their promotion and propositions. The move, was months ahead of the divorce that WAS PLANNED AND ARRANGED BY OTHERS as the vehicle through which to 'destroy / silence an objector'. Intriguingly, the only provider of the address as used by the UKMM could only have been 'offered' by OTHER INSIDERS who were in tune with the activities and the constructive frauds that are organised through the FAMILY COURTS, in an allegedly civilised pseudo-democracy. [*Link from here to an introduction to the UKMM parts]

Most evident the recipients' contempt for their OBLIGATIONS to the rest of society, the taxpayers. Running around, proclaiming their grasp and love for the rights of the suckers they all decided to use for pecuniary advantage, their priority..... AFTER DISCOVERING the carrot at the end of the tunnel - the undeclared and tax-free REWARD, at that, the black economy organised by the criminals in control of the legal system and the courts. [*Link to page where we expose the facilities used]

On the left we publish images of copies of the letter & submissions as  posted to the Secretary of the European Commission.

Visitors, readers and researchers are pointed to the fact that the Postal Services in the United Kingdom, maintain DUPLICATE RECORDS, for Registered Postings.

Copies of the letter / submissions to the ECHR and Barrister's Opinion were delivered to all 'victims who had been in touch with us. As covered above, 76 sets were posted to members of the LIPS crowd/mob, using the Proof of Posting Facility [*Link to evidence]

Others received copies as the letters to Mr Peter Hayward, Mrs Philomena Cullen and Mr Peter Prankerd, which the images on the right establish and evince.

NOT ONE of the three leading lights, especially the first two, the fronts and controlling managers of the LIPS crowd/mob bothered or expressed any interest in the matters raised and submitted to the ECHR. It was not long after the first two, named here, before the first named (with the participation and in agreement with the other two, we name & others) when the first named established WHAT THEIR PLANS WERE FOR THE GROUP THEY WERE LEADING / CONTROLLING.

We need only point to the fact that NOT ONE MEMBER OF THE CROWD / MOB BOTHERED TO ADDRESS THE ISSUES COVERED & EXPOSED IN OUR EXCLUSIVE PAGE. THERE, WE COVER THE ACTIVITIES THAT AMOUNT TO CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS ON THE TAXPAYERS THROUGH ARROGANT & BLUNT ABUSE OF THE COURTS PROCESSES / FACILITIES, & THE CORRUPTION OF THE MORONS THEY DRAW INTO THEIR WORLD.

We publish and draw attention to pages where we expose the activities of known and recognised 'fraudsters club recruits'. We refer to persons who act as lovers of the arrangements in place FOR SUPPRESSING THE FACTS OF LIFE, AS ORGANISED THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS, FROM THE TAXPAYERS. All were made aware of our objections to the arrogant free-for-all and blunt constructive frauds. Not one ever expressed any concerns or considered the fact that by endorsing 'the stipulation attached to confidential REWARDS amounted to participation in the arrogant frauds on the budget. [*Link to evidence]

Persons who were familiar with the scenario promoted by Mr Scarth, most certainly were told / received faxes to the effect that the nephew, who was to inherit the property (Mr Scarth was in sole occupation of, after the demise of the terminally ill owner) simply arrived LATE, ACCOMPANIED BY POLICE officers in order to throw him out.

In the Appeal, as copied to Mr. Andrew Yiannides of human-rights, it was a case of 'LATER' not LATE.

The word made it clear that it was a CASE OF EARLIER problems and obstructions by Mr Scarth, leading to the nephew having to seek assistance in order to gain access to the property. The image above and comments on the right are dedicated to Mr Patrick Cullinane of the IBRG. He was more than conscious of the antics he took Mr Yiannides along to watch at Sheffield Crown Court. His part in suppression of the realities & USE OF THE FACILITIES for more of the same are but a classic example of the sold.

Image of email on the left above is of submissions to Mr Norman Scarth by Mr Andrew Yiannides.

The email representations were WARRANTED. The CONTENT, as is, when Mr Scarth forwarded a copy of his draft Notice of Appeal in respect of his court actions against the nephew who inherited the property to which Mr Norman Scarth invited himself, in order, as he was proclaiming for months / years,  "... to look after an ailing and dying man". [*Link from here to the email]

When he received the email from Mr Yiannides and he was told what the appeal pointed to he, Mr Scarth, blew his top / a gasket.

He HAD been promoting the scenario that the nephew just arrived at the property Leeds, accompanied with the police simply to throw him out. His chosen words, when settling the appeal were MOST REVEALING INDEED.

In the circumstances it should be clear WHY Mr. Yiannides did not attend any of the hearings in respect of the created scenarios on the issue of 'the targeted for conversion to legal costs property'. Odd it was not, that a victim of similar activities, the conversion of an inheritance to legal costs through abuse of the courts facilities FAILED TO ACT AS REQUESTED, noted and seen to be acting through such defaults in tandem with Mr Norman Scarth & Co., the LIPS crowd/mob enterprising activities.

Any wonder, also, why Mr Yiannides was conveniently AND UNJUSTIFIABLY apprehended by the police, thereby obstructing him from returning to the court to hear the judge's summing up and guidance to the jury? (Another alleged party to the wrongs one Patrick Cullinane, an alleged legal guru operating in the courts, on the day was doing his best to protract the apprehension of both Mr Yiannides & himself).

Any wonder, also, why Mr Scarth arranged with his affiliates in deception and misrepresentation aplenty, Ms Carolyn Marsden especially, TO DENY COPY OF THE TRANSCRIPT of the theatrical production (trial) at Sheffield Crown Court to Andrew? 

Page1

Norman DISCOVERS

Page2

• A ruling which Mr Norman Scarth discovered years late as the print date (bottom right hand corner) evinces.
• His COMMENTS IN THE FIRST IMAGE (circled in red) qualify much. He had been made very much aware of the content of the Appeal* [*L] linked to from here. The Appeal was settled and lodged at Bow County Court in May 1992, by Mr. A Yiannides. At the time attempts had been ongoing in the course of fraudulent County Court proceedings to defraud the founder of human-rights of his (the founder's) rights in and at law.(NOTE: the link below takes one straight to the elements pleaded & the issues pleaded  in the explicit Appeal which the fraudster chose to IGNORE AND SUPPRESS, never referred to or pointed out in his postings established which side of the fence he was in and operating as an allegedly concerned person who set out to challenge and expose allegedly the  .
• We refer to 'The Breeding Grounds' case Appeal and we point out that the *link [*L] from here takes visitors straight to the elements Mr. Scarth 'discovered and commented upon' years later. In due course we will release more evidence in support of the challenges that produced the results stated in the page where we relate and cover the blunt abuse of the courts facilities & the fraudulent attempts to obstruct /deny Justice.

Above, one reads of elements which Mr Norman Scarth discovered & noted, when he accessed the CoA judgement, in 'The Times' Law Reports. It should be noted that the case was / is dating back to April 1997. The appeal as settled, by Mr Andrew Yiannides which he lodged at Bow County Court, TOOK PLACE IN MAY 1992. The appeal is dedicated to Mr Scarth and to all of his associates and the fraudsters from within the LIPS crowd/mob. It is also dedicated to all of their affiliates and chums who 'fell in love with the system as is' leading to such persons, as 'the self promoting hero' (refer to his book 'Cause for Concern') to join the operatives of it. For years he was observed and noted to be dancing cheek to cheek with the managers of Crimes Incorporated United Kingdom Unlimited (CIUKU) Enterprises, while OBSTRUCTING WITH INTENT the work for human rights, which work he allegedly wished to contribute towards / for. His real aims, however, were AND AS SEEN FROM THE CONTENT OF THE LETTER (above) which he sent to Mr Andrew Yiannides, were for Mr. Norman Scarth and his chums to CASH IN ON THE EXISTING FACILITIES FOR THE DOUBLE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS ON THE TAXPAYERS, hence his only reason why he never published anything in the public domain, in the process ONE & ALL IGNORING THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO SOCIETY, clearly stipulated under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Like the rest of the fraudsters he joined forces with HE TOO WAS AFTER THE CASH UNDER THE TABLE and never mind the money laundering of and proceeds from CRIMINAL ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES, as his chum Johan Michael Richard Foenander wrote of to Mr Geoffrey Harold Scriven in late 1999.  [*LINK to the appeal as lodged at Bow County Court in May 1992. *LINK to the explicit page where we expose the facility FOR RECKLESS FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS as promulgated and used by fraudsters of Mr. Norman Scarth's mentality and aptitude to Parliament's Law].

Below confirmation of a Caveat entry by Norman Scarth.

• The image on the right is of a FAX communication which Mr Norman Scarth, forwarded to Mr Andrew Yiannides. It relates to the proceedings instituted by the nephew who inherited the property where Mr Scarth was residing, following the death of the owner.
• Mr Scarth had been promoting an assault, by the police and the nephew who inherited the property of the deceased, whom, one and all had been informed Mr Scarth was looking after, as a live-in friend of and care person for the deceased.
• The Caveat, as entered, raises a question. How come the date of death was not specific but some day between the 2nd and the 8th of August 1999?
• Where was Mr Scarth during that span of time? 

NOTE:- Visitors, readers and researchers should read the FAX/letter on the right. The activities of & for which Mr Scarth and his mates from within the LIPS crowd/mob were the Star Performers, point to 'the attempts to have Mr. Norman Scarth certified, under the Mental Health Acts, nothing but organised scenarios by the very stars because of what had been on the cards for years : 'The Plans of the LIPS crowd/mobsters had been and were to act as the Alternative Legal Services for the promotion and execution of the second constructive frauds on the taxpayers [*Link [*L] to the exclusive page where WE EXPOSE THE FACILITIES IN PLACE FOR INSTITUTIONALLY ORGANISED FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE OF THE   COURTS FACILITIES]. The content of Mr Yiannides' communication VERY CLEAR. It was essential at the time, when the FAX was transmitted to St Luke's Hospital, to put 'THE ACTIVITIES' (not simply events) on record. Four of Mr Scarth's colleagues, from within the LIPS hierarchy, were instrumental in the creation of the scenario / scripts as presented to Mr Andrew Yiannides, to whom the letter, from Mr. Scarth in October 2003. The aforesaid letter from Mr Scarth prompted Mr A. Yiannides to create this web-page, for obvious reasons, The fact remains that Mr Johan Michael Richard Foenander was the only person to have been the bearer of the bad news when he told Mr Yiannides that, "Norman will be arrested now because he can't go back to Eva's place (Beneston Hall) for he is not welcome there; she has withdrawn the provision of accommodation and he is now in breach of the bail conditions". The script admirable, the ploy PURE EVIL MONGERING and idiotic promotion of organised frauds on the targeted who fall for such childish and absurd scenarios. In the first instance WHO informed the police that Mr Scarth, having walked out of the Hospital was not welcome back to Beneston Hall? (Mr Scarth had been in hospital for the treatment of the injuries he sustained in the course of the eviction from the property he invited himself to >>> Link from here [*L] to IMPORTANT REVELATIONS in July 2009 <<<. Mr Scarth DID TELEPHONE Mr A Yiannides that attempts had been afoot, at the hospital, to have him Certified as a Mental case. When Mr Johan M R Foenander was informed of the FAX/letter (on the right) from Mr Yiannides he telephoned Mr Yiannides and his outburst gave more than enough away, "What did you do that for, you fuc.... Greek shit?". Mr Scarth was informed of the outburst and as far as Mr Yiannides was concerned, that was the end of the matter BUT NOT THE SCENARIO. Some time later when an application by Mr Geraldahu Ebert, at the RCJ, was attended by 'many of the interested LIPS crowd/mob, and other aspiring Alternative Legal Services hopefuls, Messrs Scarth and Foenander sat next to one another, both ignored the presence of Mr Yiannides and the two were acting as two love birds. The fact that Mr Scarth (who was told of the vile verbal assault on Mr Yiannides by Johan M R Foenander) failed to tell his chum and co-star for the scenarios (refer also to the page* [*L] /2lipstalk.htm) to apologise for the vulgar telephone call to Mr Yiannides, CONCLUDED THE TRUTH OF THE MATTER. It is for the reader to consider if Mr Yiannides' concerns, about Norman Scarth's well-being, constituted grounds for another allegedly similarly concerned party, were grounds to assault Mr Yiannides as Mr Johan M R Foenander had done because of other reasons. It is also for the reader to consider the simple reality that Mr Yiannides had simply made sure that the attempts to create a route for access 'to the serfs' in Mental Institutions, were put on record, as the scenario was unfolding. THE EVENTS at the RCJ, also which other parties were engaged in the scripts for the day, simply confirmed the obvious, to anyone who ever bothered to look into the activities at and in alleged Courts of / for Justice where anything and everything goes as long as targeted assets are disseminated and or targeted / earmarked 'serfs' benefit from that which the pre-scripted scenarios provide and are aimed for. [*Link [*L] from here to another exclusive page where evidence is published in respect of a commercial fraud WHEN A FORGERY was created and used by the legal circles with the blessings of the criminals who were acting as alleged judicious persons whereas CONTEMPT FOR PARLIAMENT'S LAW was their prime objective as long as the plans of all were met. Denial of rights and THEFT OF & CONVERSION TO LEGAL COSTS OF TARGETED ASSETS / PROPERTIES, the objectives of the criminals in control of the legal services and the courts.   

FOOTNOTE
Footnote eXtra: In October 2010, the coalition's Attorney General, in an interview published by 'COUNSEL' specifically spoke of the police distancing themselves from cases of (small-fry) fraud and asserted that he was making that element his department's priority* [*Link from here to the evidence]. IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN, WHAT the coalition of the Con-LibDems, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY WILL IN FACT ATTEND TO THE RAMPANT FRAUD, and IF IT WILL DEAL with the criminals who abuse public office, especially when faced with appropriate submissions and claims that will be delivered in due course. Visitors/readers are urged to read the article published in the London Evening Standard, as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003 [*Link from here to the article we reproduce in another webpage and consider "Why tolerate the arrogance of the legal circles who had and have the audacity to assert to the lawmakers that the y, the lawmakers have nothing to do with the law"].
While there, above it, the explicit letter to ex-Minister, the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. ALL alleged victim-challengers who contacted Andrew Yiannides, by the time the letter was sent to the Minister, received copy of the letter just as they received copies of other letters submitted to government maintained Ministers and other official appointees to public office. Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance. It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when called upon properly in truly democratic states. The above in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and among such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens that led to the right actions by governments, the explicit challenges when we set about exposing one of the most evil of alleged victims of the legal circles to have ever contacted us [*Link to our explicit submissions to (a)  the Prime Minister, (b) the Chancellor / Treasury, (c) the Home Secretary. WE acted so after we had secured more than enough evidence about the parts of an alleged victim whose only interests were (i) the rewards under the table FOR KEEPING QUIET about the ORGANISED FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES and (ii) her parts in blunt attempts that were intended to discredit the person she was sent along to mess about with, Mr Andrew Yiannides]. Access please the letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1998 [*Link* [*L] from here to the letter] and note the results evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal) also within days of the letter reaching its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges -lovers and 'promoters of the system as is'- on the job for decades; one and all acting as sold souls always do [*Link [*L] from here to the evidence we point to relative to the parts of one of a number of sold to the system fraudsters who were sent along / introduced to Andrew Yiannides by the managers / organisers of the LIPS crowd / mob].
   1.   Norman arranged for Andrew Yiannides to be taken by one Patrick Cullinane (who claims to be a case worker for the IBRG), to Bradford for the last week of the trial at Sheffield Crown Court. What transpired earlier and how material facts had been withheld by Norman Scarth, Andrew was to discover a few days later and are reserved for another day. However, on the second day of that week's recommenced trial, the foreman of the jury threw the spanner in the works - a spoiler one might say; the director of the theatrical production, the judge, was asked to provide the jury with copies of important DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE to which the actor, Norman Scarth, repetitiously referred. How the judge reacted and how the star of the show, Norman Scarth performed was NOT baffling but a give-away. Norman's FAILURE TO GRASP the opportunity and to change the direction of the  mockery of a trial, by producing the requested evidence, was put in the same drawer as the recorded telephone arguments, between Norman and Geoffrey Scriven, the President of the LIPS crowd/mob. The 'sold to the system as is' stooge and charlatan (Norman Scarth) played back the said recording of heated telephone exchanges, as soon as  Mr. Patrick Cullinane and Mr Andrew Yiannides arrived at Bradford after 2am in the morning. It was blatantly clear that 'the offering was part of the preliminaries to the theatrical performances that Mr Yiannides was 'required' to witness at court. The recorded arguments, among other issues, included the expected public funds for the dream of the LIPS crowd/mob; their plans for a  Law Centre such as the Lord Chancellor spoke of in his submissions to the Home Affairs Select Committee in November 1999 [*Link from here [*L] to official report].  The aforesaid a and   with the PICK UPON AND ACCORDINGLY PRODUCE THE EVIDENCE requested by the jury was but a , and how Andrew ACTED SUBSEQUENTLY because of Norman's convenient defaults to provide the jury with the material EVIDENCE the judge himself defaulted to hand over. Such conduct by director and actor provided more than enough. The failures of both to conduct themselves as THE OCCASION COMMANDED placed then both in the only category & class of the occasion in respect of the issues that any one with some common sense can use and draw the necessary conclusions as to the scams and lousy scripts actors and directors engaged in. (* Link to the very relevant issues, above and note that what you will be reading is only a small part of the scam and the constructive frauds that all engaged in).
    2.   The issues raised with the Lord Chancellor's office and the relevance of the fraud on the unsuspecting public, whereby assured protection and rights under the law (any law) were non-existent (as arranged by successive governments for the provisions of the European Convention of Human Rights) and any other law ON THE STATUTE BOOKS, as and how judicial chair occupants were systematically acting in contempt thereof, WAS the only reason why the arrangement for a review of the case (without such application by the targeted victim - Andrew) to the court. (a*Link [*L] to the stated facts - event - b*Link [*L] to another case when the same issues were raised with the Lord Chancellor's office and as a result THE BILL OF RIGHTS WAS RASHLY ANNOUNCED, by His Lordship).
    3.    The element of 'victims' going for the carrot at the end of the tunnel (*Link [*L] to conditional rewards) is covered in the exclusive page that ALL OF THE RECIPIENTS of the email copied (above) in this page failed to address. AS HOPEFULS & RECRUITS themselves, to the constructive frauds through the courts, they had and have every reason NOT TO OBJECT TO THE ARRANGEMENTS in place. Such persons accepted and accept retainers to/and work FOR THE SYSTEM'S OPERATORS against any challenger, in any manner they are directed to do. They target the needy victims of the legal circles. (One Hussein was given information that was used to target a victim who was ripe for the picking - Mr Johan Michael Foenander; *Link [*L] to left column, scanned images in page, a letter wherein the latter's expressed knowledge of the criminal activities at, in and through the courts). Going for the carrot UNDER THE TERMS & CONDITIONS clearly stated and AS ARRANGED BY THE ABDUCTORS & RAPISTS OF JUSTICE was but the corner stone upon which the LIPS crowd/mob set about to conduct 'their business' as legal experts, just like other groups as covered in the explicit extract from a solicitor's letter to a client, in March 2003 (*Link). Peter Hayward, Norman Scarth, Nick Haralabidis, Johan Foenander, Veronica Beryl Foden, were/are five of the protagonists who made it their business to abuse Andrew's time and goodwill while acting their roles as 'perfect Fraudsters' Club Recruits'. One Lew(is) Foley (a well known 'victim') had been using an old age pensioner for 'more of the same in the theatres they dare refer to as halls of justice. Visitors to our pages can read, how in recorded telephone exchanges between Norman Scarth and Johan Foenander, (*Link to published transcript) the former was exalting the capabilities of the said Lou Foley, the person who was using the old age pensioner for the ego-trips, and other plans of the Fraudsters Club Recruits, inclusive of the promotion of one another's capabilities as alleged legal eagles. It should be noted that the aforesaid telephone exchanges took place in the course of a call instigated by Johan Foenander whose prime objective at the time (as it appears from the recording) was to intimidate and influence Norman Scarth to cease co-operating with Andrew for and in the interest of human rights. It should be stressed that the attempt was before Norman Scarth was sold to the idea of acting as the Honorary Secretary of the LIPS crowd/mob. Some person's price is easily arrived at when one recognises the person's weaknesses and or even vice that can be used or even created by the criminals who are in control in any pseudo-democracy that is maintained in the same principles and through the same practices the managers of CIUKU Enterprises follow.
    4.   Johan Michael Foenander & Eva Adshead, were/are two pro-active inner circle LIPS 'lovers of the system as is', operators. Note Mr Norman Scarth's words [*L]: 'Sometimes as Mackenzie friend.... ' and draw your own conclusions. The two set about preparing a bundle of documented evidence about one Hussein, the chap who initiated Mr Johan Foenander in the lucrative and enterprising use of the arrangements in place FOR THE DOUBLE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS ON THE TAXPAYERS, through abuse of the courts facilities. That was PRECISELY what Mr Johan Michael Foenander and his solicitors EXPOSED through the letter we publish in this page [*L]. MANY the fraudsters club recruits who were noted to be pro-active and engaging in the scheme. The arrangements in place, just FOR ASSES who go for the carrot irrespective of the fact that they knew of and were pointed to the fact that anyone agreeing to keep quiet (*Link from here [*L] to confidentiality stipulation and rewards for such asses), was promoting the apparent / CONVENIENT lack of interest by the media to address the rampant fraud through the courts, were accessories and abettors to the TWO FRAUDS on budget funds. ALL HAD BEEN MADE AWARE of the fact that they could use their rights in order to EXPOSE the offenders / abusers [*L] of judicial chair occupation. They could use the INTERNET through the facilities provided, for free, by human-rights and other organisations. We did not expect any of 'the fraudsters club recruits', to use the prepared bundle of evidence, covering abuse of the courts' facilities by the Hussein chap with and for others he was associating with FOR CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS, on unsuspecting victims. Among the victims an Austrian beverage company that a number of the LIPS crowd/mob knew of. Mr Foenander tried to justify that fraud, simply on grounds of lack of action by the police while he failed or overlooked HIS attempts to impress Andrew of human-rights with some reports by a charlatan who opined that solicitors who retained and CO-OPERATED or USED THE FRAUDSTER (as an alleged barrister/solicitor) were innocent of that fraudster's blunt and arrogant criminal activities. "As far as the police goes, NOTHING UNUSUAL", Mr Foenander was informed,"BECAUSE THE POLICE WERE / ARE  PART OF THE ORGANISED FRAUDS ON 'THE SERFS",  care of and ALL RELYING on the arrangements in place, through the courts (Link [*L] to proof). DUE TO THE FACT that at the time some of the condescending media* [*L] were promoting other grounds for Summonsing Mr Geoffrey Scriven to court, and BECAUSE ALLEGATIONS OF VEXATIOUS LITIGANT had been abandoned / dropped by the Attorney General, in the past, it was necessary to take other steps. ESPECIALLY AS IT WAS ANTICIPATED THAT 'the dust in your eyes' ploy' was not likely to be used by any of the fraudsters club recruits, even if the Attorney General was likely to Summons Mr G H Scriven to court for a Vexatious Litigant, gagging order. Indeed such a Summons ALLEGEDLY was served BUT THE EVIDENCE prepared by the actor was NOT USED. Steps were taken by human-rights to create a Citizens' Alternative Precedent - case in order to establish that such ploys as the LIPS crowd/mob were to rely upon for their parts in the rampant constructive frauds on the taxpayers and any visitor to these page can contact the webmaster for information and links to another web-site when such a precedent case was created THROUGH APPROPRIATE CHALLENGES by human-rights.
   5.   It was widely reported, in the media, that Mr G H Scriven had been acting in breach and in contempt of an alleged consent order. It was well known (and there existed witnesses to the fact) that he was caused to capitulate to blackmail by abusers of  judicial chair occupation. It Furthermore, the way he was forced to be party to such an instrument HAD BEEN TAKEN UP by his  Member of Parliament who set down an Early Day Motion for debate by the House. The ploy, however, was not recognised for what it was / is in a pseudo-democracy (Link [*L] to confirmation of the ploy as covered in a letter by a solicitor). In view of the aforesaid reasons for Summonsing Mr G H Scriven before the courts, the founder of human-rights (Mr Andrew Yiannides) took steps to create a parallel situation, in respect of CONSENT ORDERS (agreed between the parties). Mr Yiannides did so because of the need to cover and DEAL WITH ALL MANNER OF ACTIVITIES BY THE LEGAL CIRCLES & THE COURTS, WHEN CONVERSION OF ASSETS & RIGHTS TO PROPERTIES (including rights in law) ARE EARMARKED FOR THEFT AND TRANSFER VIA ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES. Mr Scarth, among other fraudsters club recruits, was duly briefed as matters developed AND HE WAS FULLY AWARE OF THE ATTEMPTS TO CONVERT AN AGREED LIABILITY - subject to a consent order  - TO LEGAL COSTS THROUGH CONTEMPT OF THE AGREED SETTLEMENT - Court Order. As happens always with alleged challengers WHO ARE IN FACT FRAUDSTERS WHO ARE SOLD TO THE RAMPANT FRAUD & CORRUPTION THROUGH THE COURTS, his excellency the champion of crocodile tears, along with his mates within the LIPS crowd / mob and their associates / affiliates SHOVED SUCH NEWS : factual activities by the legal circles and the courts in the dark corners of their perverted and corrupted minds. The full facts and the evidence in the case were published in an explicit web-site AND NOT ONE OF THE FRAUDSTERS ever referred to it in private exchanges LET ALONE POINT TO THE CRIMINAL IN INTENT ATTEMPTS TO STEAL THE OWED (agreed) MONEYS THAT ALLEGEDLY HAD BEEN PAID / SENT TO THE COURT, conveniently not as the order stipulated. EACH & EVERY contact from within the LIPS fraudsters club, were informed of the fact that a judge from within the confines of the very court set about issuing directions FOR MORE THEATRICAL PRODUCTIONS AS THAT FRAUD OF A PUBLIC SERVANT WAS AIMING WHEN HE ISSUED SUCH A VILE INSTRUMENT.
   6.    Amazing how well informed the fraudsters club recruits appear to be. As part of CIUKU Enterprises some of them are aware of the other elements and what the other lovers and operatives of the system are up to. Particulars will be released in due course. In the meantime dear visitors / readers / researchers look forward to another side to and the vile parts in which the LIPS crowd / mob introduction, Mrs Veronica Beryl Fodder indulged as a fully fledged operative and lover of the constructive frauds on the taxpayers and persons targeted.
   7.   Visitors, readers and researchers who are not familiar with the words of John Swainton, the insider who was very clear when he spoke of the role of the media in pseudo-democracies (when he moved out of the firing line, retired) should proceed to the paragraph this link from here [*L] takes them to. After taking in the insider's loud and clear message (intended for thinkers / humans, not 'serfs') the visitor should access the page* [*L] where the plans of the abductors of Democracy and Justice are exposed, through the work first published in 1902, in Russia. Reading all of the material in the page is most important for persons whose background is entrenched in Judeo-Christian-Islamic 'preaching'. Link from here [*L] to stated realities in the order of developments as of and following a telephone call, which Mr. Johan Michael Richard Foenander instigated (apparently) and recorded the activities behind the scenes. He passed the tape recording on, immaterial if accidentally or with intent, because his parts and activities, as an accomplished fraudsters club recruit, were recognised as of the time when he failed to Appeal an alleged hearing at the RCJ. He sought and expected a defective Statement / Affidavit from Mr Andrew Yiannides in respect of the 'alleged hearing'. THE HEARING WAS A BUT A TYPICAL THEATRICAL PRODUCTION. He expected of Mr A Yiannides to SUPPRESS THE MOST RELEVANT ISSUES BORN OF THE EVENTS as OF the time when he, Mr Johan Michael Richard Foenander, made contact and the events / activities & his reckless defaults thereafter. Such expectations and DEMANDS from A TYPICAL FRAUDSTERS CLUB RECRUIT, persons who complain of and about suppression of materiel facts by the legal circles EXPECTING & DEMANDING OF OTHERS TO INDULGE in the same MALIGNED, activities in cases they are or get involved in. [*Link to the foundations upon which the recruits work TO BUILT ON, FOR THE ENTRENCHMENT OF THE PRACTICES within the legal system and the courts. They allege and ASSERT that they are challenging the wrongs, but their only activities are to be seen to be dancing cheek to cheek with the abductors and RAPISTS OF JUSTICE. It is for readers, victims and researchers to RECOGNISE why such fraudsters make sure the taxpayers are KEPT IN THE DARK on the issue of THE REWARDS THEY WORK FOR in tandem with the abusers of the courts facilities in THE RAMPANT CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS THROUGH THE COURTS].
   8.    The Solicitors Indemnity Fund ALWAYS appoints and authorises a THIRD FIRM OF SOLICITORS to defend a solicitor or firm of solicitors who wronged a client / clients. The agents / managers of the SIF, always ignore ALL EVIDENCE PROVING / ESTABLISHING FRAUD by the solicitors. Such mentality & attitudes ESTABLISH CONTEMPT FOR THE LAW & THE FACT THAT the SIF (as an assurance / insurance) IS NOT BOUND UNDER THE TERMS OF COVER to act for and in respect of any claim that is founded and rests on FRAUD. No insurance ever covered or offers cover for FRAUD, especially when the fraud was/is proven to have been instigated / executed by the insured and the insured's agents, persons who are LEFT TO THEIR OWN DEVICES.
   9.   Visitors, readers and researchers should access from this paragraph the two pages from the transcript of a recording, which Mr Norman Scarth created with permission from a full Court of Appeal bench, Lord Justice Woolf, Master of the Rolls presiding for the occasion. Only two images / pages, from the transcript, were published in our pages, as soon as Mr Scarth forwarded the transcript to Mr Yiannides. Mr Scarth was not happy at the fact that not all of the transcript (pages) had been published in the public domain, by us. In the meantime he, himself, had been failing to challenge and expose, in the public domain, that which he complained about..... suppression of the realities of life in the courts. Breach of his agreement, with Andrew Yiannides, to co-operate as a Community on Line member and as webmaster for the County of Yorkshire was of no relevance to him. Mr Yiannides' response to his disappointment was simple : *SINCE THE ISSUE RESTED ON THE PRINCIPLE OF 'NO SUPPRESSION & OPEN COURT HEARINGS = UNADULTERATED RECORDS OF COURT HEARINGS*, the goal HAD BEEN ACHIEVED care of the creation of THAT PRECEDENT CASE by the Court of Appeal. Years later, after failing to act as he had agreed with us, he expected of the one whose time and assistance he had been abusing ONLY FOR HIS PLANS WITH OTHERS, all of whom recognised *as committed FRAUDSTERS CLUB RECRUITS who were only aiming to capitalise / use the facility FOR RAMPANT FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS. Anyone with a grain of grey matter in his / her skull should enquire of Mr Scarth (and any of his associates, within the LIPS crowd / mob and or their affiliates : "Why seek to abuse Mr Yiannides' time, when ALL IT SHOULD TAKE - anyone wishing to record court proceedings in lower courts - SHOULD BE TO PRINT FROM THE WEB-SITE (http://www.uk-human-rights.org/scarthrecords.htm) THE 2 PAGES, the PROOF THAT THE COURT OF APPEAL CONCEDED TO THE INALIENABLE RIGHT FOR UNADULTERATED RECORDS OF / FOR HEARINGS in the courts of the United Kingdom. In other words WHY hinge on and with fraudulent intent promote all manner of negatives AND CONVENIENTLY / FRAUDULENTLY SUPPRESS ANY & ALL POSITIVES? [*Link from here [*L] to transcript pages where we added fair comment as our observations in view of the fact that NOT ONE OF THE FRAUDSTERS CLUB RECRUITS who received invitations to contribute their input towards the Petition to the ECoHR, as pointed to above, in this page]. 
   10.   *Link from here [*L] to statements in email exchanges that were never challenged by the 'sold to the system and the cash under the table facility, Norman Scarth OR ANY OF HIS ASSOCIATES & AFFILIATES. Marvel at the hypocrite's undisclosed commitment and agreement with others to work against OUR AIMS and the person person who had always been there for him. There were three occasions when it was clear that Mr Norman Scarth was up to no good; there was the instance when he forwarded to Mr Andrew Yiannides application forms for completion, by Mr Yiannides, which application Mr Scarth intended to submit to Leeds Council. The application was related to the plans of Lord Irvine, the Lord Chancellor to rely on volunteers to act as the alternative legal services for which plans the *link from here [*L] to the official records, when the Lord Chancellor explained his plans to the Home Affairs Select Committee in November 1999. No diligent and concerned citizen / victims, nor readers and researchers could possibly fail to note the cross-relation between the application BY the LIPS crowd/mob managers whose only interests had been and were to set up in business and to operate as one of the many mushrooms springing up and waiting in the pipelines to offer alternative legal services to to 'the serfs'. 
   11.   xxx 
   12.   xxx 
   13.   xxx
   14.   xxx