ARCHIVE for Members (work & contributions) *Page created March 2003* |
 |
Page last revised on October 13, 2011 - NOTE : we can include or
furnish information in respect of bookmarks to link to in our pages |
| Added material
including links to ne material at the site and links to other websites from covered /
pointed to elements |
Visitors should access
FOOTNOTE ONE (*F1),
for an important definition .
- This page will contain links to documents by, and NEWSLETTERS forwarded to, members of
the Community on Line.
- Also links to documents authored by Community on Line
members in connection with special events and or cases
covering elements for consideration AND POSSIBLE CONTRIBUTION from other members, because
of the special interest in particular projects.
- We will also endeavour to include links to
and for other tools that we consider useful and or for /
about which members of the Community need or should have information about and or help
with.
- In all these areas we anticipate
co-operation apropos from the members. Recognition of the value of the facilities for all
to share and to benefit from is a foregone conclusion.
There can be no
development and advancement in the fight against the well organised evil forces out there,
without proper development of converging energies and joint forces / activities by persons
who genuinely wish to challenge the offending abductors and rapists of both Democracy and
Justice in the pseudo-democracies that the evil forces in control are promoting as 'the'
genuine states.
|
|
| Each entry in the list below has a title, a summary link, a list of
authors / contributors, dates of publication or when last updated, a distribution designation, and links to the material in
various formats. Each entry also has its bookmark noted,
to help authors making links to it from other web sites - their pages. |
Documents -
Supported Statements |
| Recognition
of Fraudulent Democratic States. |
| 'Dictatorship through the back door' [*L1] & 'Fraudulent democratic states', was first written of, and
about, by the founder of human-rights in the early 1970's. At the time a forgery was
introduced, in High Court proceedings, by the legal circles [*L2];
professionals who were/are licensed to practise so by the Law Society and the Bar Council
in the United Kingdom. All were/are free to indulge in crime as licensed criminals with
the blessings of the judiciary [*L3] and the police [*L4]; two
bodies maintained, by the state, as 'the servants of the public' (in any genuine
democracy) [*L5] at the public's expense [*L6] - the
taxpayers [*L7]. Common services for 'security of person, for the
well being and personal property of all [*L8], with the attached 'protection of the citizens from
crime and criminals' [*L9], the core element, non existent, care of the
observation that Charles Louis Montesquieu noted some two centuries earlier [*L10]. The events and practices that developed at and through the courts [*L11], and the additional contempt of the law by the police in London [*L12], all the way up to the office of Sir Robert Mark, the Metropolitan Police
Commissioner, justifying the founder's conclusions [*L13]. The
Law - ALL LAW - non-existent or printed, by parliament, in invisible ink and no issues in
Braille for the blind either. Net result: 'Law and order by and through the blind, the
deaf and the dumb, in mind and spirit [*L14], - as arranged/organised by the mentally so
impaired, public servants [*L15] who were/are of the opinion that all citizens can
be treated as 'the subjects of the corrupters, the corrupt and the corrupted'. |
|
By:
Yiannides,
Andrew
Date:
March
17, 1997
Distribution: Integrated material - web-pages.
Footnote one: From '*L'links above for introduction to some material.
Bookmark: Specific elements / webpages & Articles by
Diogenis at http://www.justiceraped.org |
Declaration for Main
Objective |
The core component and element of the challenges and exposures by
the victims of the legal system, rests on the issue of the alleged separation*(*F1) of powers*
[*L1], in pseudo-democracies [*L2]. From within such states, politicians hide
behind the criminals who are abusing occupation of judicial chairs [*L3]. Through such persons, the
imposition of undeclared policies [*L4] and plans for mankind that are determined through conspiratorial
meetings behind closed doors. Non-democratic practices and secret meetings by members and
followers of millennia-old satanic movements and organisations [*L5]. The element of 'judicial' decisions
always promoted by the media barons, the supporters and secret partners of the criminals
who are in control of the courts, in pseudo-democracies [*L6]. The very use of the word 'judicial' betraying, as it has for
centuries, either their illiteracy [*L7] or their blind participation in arrogant dictatorial impositions by
and through the criminals who parade themselves as 'the authorities of 'the law' they are
supposed to administer [*L8]. Crafty politicians and media barons indulging in gross misrepresentations to
the naive and gullible 'serfs' they mislead, with intent [*L9]. Blunt and arrogant abuse of a facility
in place, 'the much revered independence of the judiciary' who 'simply indulge in contempt
of all law [*L10]
and evidence [*L11]
while in pursuit of pre-planned states for the targeted serfs' [*L12]. In alleged democratic states, nothing
but a diabolical rouse through which to defraud the citizens of rights that, allegedly,
are assured in law [*L13]. OUR AIMS, clear [*L14]; justice 'to be seen to be done' is the ever-called-upon assertion
by the abductors and rapists of Democracy & Justice. The 'open to the world jury
facility, the Internet and our pages, OPEN and available to all citizens with access to
the Internet [*L15].
All exposed abusers of facilities and the trust of the people', the accused, 'guaranteed a
fairer hearing and airing of any excuses or justifications they care to advance in support
of their evil activities [*L16]. The same applies to and for all 'fraudster club recruits', to all
sold souls [*L17] to
all evil-mongering defaulters who have been exhibiting their love for and their
endorsement of the double fraud on the taxpayers [*L18] through their repetitious and convenient failures to address the
facts and the realities covered in our exclusive page [*L19]. |
|
By:
Yiannides, Andrew
Date: January 1, 1997
Distribution: Internal & web-pages
Formats: MSWord.doc
(1,480 k), .rtf (xxx k), web-page.HTML
URL:
http://www.human-rights.org/ouraims.htm |
|
The Need for Submissions to the Home
Secretary in 1999 |
For well over
four years we were looking into aspects of constructive frauds against targeted sections
of the communities. Instigators and participating activists, public servants who are
retained to serve the citizens, pro-active and engaging in theft of properties. Local
Authorities (Councils) hard pressed for funds needed to meet the cost of the influx of
refugees and asylum seekers. Illegal entrants into the UK crossing dozens of borders, in
many instances, without claiming refuge or asylum until they reach the land of milk and
honey. Politicians and media barons proud of the fact that the British isles are the
destination lands for all who are encouraged to rush in, without any concern or
consideration as to how the cost for providing for the influx is met. Along with the
generous in words politicians and media editors, individuals working for voluntary sector
organisations that are financed through taxes, even more blunt crime and fraudulent
depletion of budget funds through abuse of public facilities and services. Rampant abuse
of public services, theft of properties, denial of rights to protection for the targeted,
simply indicative of undeclared policies, as the founder of human-rights was caused to
conclude following extensive study and research in the area of Housing Benefit, as the
evidence we publish in our pages establishes witout any room for doubt. |
FOOTNOTE:
Footnote eXtra:
In October 2010, the coalition's Attorney General, in an interview
published by 'COUNSEL' specifically spoke of the police distancing themselves
from cases of (small-fry) fraud and asserted that he was
making that element his department's priority. IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN, WHAT the
coalition of the Con-LibDems, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY WILL IN FACT ATTEND TO THE RAMPANT
FRAUD, and IF IT WILL DEAL with the criminals who abuse public office, especially
when faced with appropriate submissions and claims that will be delivered in due course.
Visitors/readers are urged to read the article published in the London Evening Standard,
as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003 [*Link from here
to the article we reproduce in another webpage and consider "Why tolerate the
arrogance of the legal circles who had and have the audacity to assert to the lawmakers
that the y, the lawmakers have nothing to do with the law"].
While there, above it, the explicit letter to
ex-Minister, the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. ALL alleged
victim-challengers who contacted Andrew Yiannides, by the time the letter was sent to the
Minister, received copy of the letter just as they received copies of other letters
submitted to government maintained Ministers and other official appointees to public
office. Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance.
It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when called upon properly
in truly democratic states. The above in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and among
such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens that led to the right actions
by governments, the explicit challenges when we set about exposing one of the most evil of
alleged victims of the legal circles to have ever contacted us [*Link to our explicit submissions to (a) the Prime
Minister, (b) the Chancellor / Treasury, (c) the Home Secretary. WE acted so after we had
secured more than enough evidence about the parts of an alleged victim whose only
interests were (i) the rewards under the table FOR KEEPING QUIET about the ORGANISED FRAUD
THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES and (ii) her parts in blunt attempts that were
intended to discredit the person she was sent along to mess about with, Mr Andrew
Yiannides]. Access please the
letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1998 [*Link* from here to the letter] and note the results evinced in the
newspaper article (Hornsey Journal) also within days of the letter reaching its
destination. Many the charlatans and stooges -lovers and 'promoters of the system as is'- on the
job for decades; one and all acting as sold souls always do [*Link from here to the evidence we point to relative to the
parts of one of a number of sold to the system fraudsters who were sent along / introduced
to Andrew Yiannides by the managers / organisers of the LIPS crowd / mob].
1. We
refer visitors, readers and researchers to the explicit assertions >ARROGANT
DECLARATION IN FACT<, by the judiciary in >the United Kingdom<, the mother
of modern parliamentary democracies. The specific assertions we copied 'from their bible',
the words are most clear and disclose / point to arrogant criminal intentions and
objectives as to the USE of a judiciary committed to the imposition of the type of
constructive frauds we cover in our pages. The interested and the concerned can
access the arrogant asserttion at the top of most of our pages at this website. The
arrogance we point to no 'human', NO THINKER, no user of grey matter can possibly overlook
when considering the assertions by the judiciary alongside the assertions by the ALLEGED
REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ELECTORATE who routinely and systematically promote the alleged
separation of powers and the indepence of the judiciary >to the sucker-serfs<, who
have taxes imposed on them for the cost of maintaining criminals in public office. CAN
ANYONE ARGUE with Andrew Yiannides' conclusion that the one and only implication when
considering the words 'independence of the judiciary', that the promoters of such
'principles' ARE NOT IN FACT DECLARING that the judiciary are independent of the
restraints of all law? We refer, of course to all law created by the alleged
representatives of the people, >the sheeple< who flock to political party rallies
and gatherings to hear of and listen to all manner of political arguments by lousy actors,
actors who fail to address THE VERY ELEMENT we refer and draw attention to here. We hasten
to add, that only ex Prime Minister Tony Blair QC, through the Spokes Person on Legal
Affairs in the House of Commons Paul Boateng, when in Opposition in July 1995, DID
acknowledge to Andrew Yiannides (the founder of human-rights) the element and BURNING
ISSUE OF FRAUD IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM, when long ongoing submissions and representations to
successive govbernments as of the late 1970s related to 'the constructive frauds ongoing
through abuse of the courts facilities, care of the abusers of judicial chair occupation
and the obvious freedom granted to the judiciary to indulge in contempt of all law', with
the blessings of the non-elected Lord Chancellors / appointed by the government of the day
and other Ministers, NOT FORGETTING THE OBLIGING POLICE WHO FAIL TO EXECUTE THEIR PUBLIC
DUTIES as their appointments and retainers 'impose on them all'. We would be failing
ourselves if we fail to point our visitors to the article* by the Home Secretary, David
Blunkett, published by the London Evening Standard on 12th May 2003, linked to from here; in the very webpage, also image of an
explicit NOTICE attached to all letters and submitted documents warranting attention by
Ministers and other SPECIFIC PUBLIC SERVANTS; we hasten to add that all dreamers,
charlatans and stooges, in fact ALL who fell in laove with the FACILITIES IN PLACE FOR
REWARDING MORONS WHO FAIL TO CONSIDER THE LAW (just like the criminals who occupy judicial
chairs in all PSEUDOdemocracies) AND SIGN ON THE DOTTE LINE, COMMITTING THEMSELVES TO
SILENCE and therby suppress the true states and conditions each adopted as we cover in a
numbwer of pages and more specifically in th epage where we cover the element of the
pludering of public funds for rewarding the victims of the legal circles, the couirts and
other public bodies / servants WHEN & AFTER THE VICTIMS COMMIT THEMSELVES TO KEEPING
IT ALL IN THE FAMILY CLOSET, the family of the fraudsters who use the couirts facilities
for fraud aplenty on 'the sucker-serfs', who are kept in th edark by one and all including
the media.
2. xxx
3. xxx
4. xxx
5. xxx
6. xxx
7. xxx
8. xxx
9. xxx
|
|
... |
|