Use Your Rights - Do not ignore Your duties to Society and your own offspring. Help stop the rot and let them inherit a better world than the one our forefathers let the abductors and rapists of Democracy & Justice create (FXXX).

The visitor's attention is drawn to the words of Jesus Christ, attributed to Him by the editors / creators of The Gospel according to St. Luke. Access His words to the lawyers some 2000 years ago. Many the dignitaries over the two millennia who shared His views [*Link to extract].

The Coat of Arms for the City of Plymouth, known and promoted as the city of the Founding Fathers: America, USA, the New World leading to the New World Order all promote without any reference to the evil behind it all. [*Link, below, to an element relative to the teachings by examples stated in the Bible of the followers of the Devil]. 

Veronica Beryl Foden, who relished engaging in activities we cover, in this & other pages, hails from the very city. The controllers of the LIPS crowd / mob could not have done better when they sent along the fraudster from the city that proclaims: "The name of the Lord is our strongest tower". [*Link to factual records / historical facts no one can ever erase. Consider why we point to the power base from whence the impositions of the Dark Ages that mankind was subjected to for over 1400 years.  Flat Earth promotions from the very fraudsters behind the creation of 3 religions, resting on the one and only, the very God they created and presented to mankind over 2300 years ago. All part of their plans & intentions for the sons of men on planet earth. [*Link to the origins and root of the Divide & Conquer evil ploy, HINTED AT in the Old Testament. Most convenient that promoters of the Old Testament assertions for over 2300 fail to address such issues, as if not there].

Anyone wishing to challenge the founder's conclusions that the Law Enforcement Agencies are adhering to the lessons learned by example stated in the most vile work ever published? Read the headline above (top of this page) and simply consider the fact CRIMINALS ARE PROTECTED while victims are coerced to join ranks with the abusers of the legal system. No person who studies diligently the extract from the Old Testament, we point to, could possibly fail to discover that it has been and is being misrepresented by the evil ones who adopted & practice the  teachings by examples stated in the OT.
Read below how the rights to benefit from and enjoy one's own properties does not apply in an allegedly civilised and  modern pseudo - democracy.

Letter from one solicitor to another evincing the adopted practices: "The taxpayers are to make good the damages you caused. We do not want to discuss your offer; so we determined and our client agrees".
The obvious needs no comment. Anyone can recognise that the client was fully aware of the fact that the solicitors were engaging in blunt fraud on the taxpayers. The client was also fully aware of the fact that the courts, from staff to court officers, and the police, were party to the frauds through blunt breaches of public office and arrogant contempt of 'The Law'. Below a three-page letter from the client of the above solicitor, when the client was writing to another victim(!) of the divorce industry. It qualifies the statement (herein-before) that the client WAS FULLY AWARE of all that took place in, and through the courts.
Page 1

Page 2

Page3

We simply point to the fact that the author of the above letter was sent along to mess around with Andrew, as a typical 'fraudsters club recruit' and member of the LIPS crowd/mob, two months after he was party to the arranged fraud on the taxpayers, as his solicitor's letter qualified.

The Headlines clear. One need only consider the fact that 'the con of a victim' WE EXPOSE IN THIS AND OTHER PAGES HAD BEEN and was a conscious party to much that converted many an asset to the legal circles. Just a matter of THREE  properties that were TARGETED and simply CONVERTED, through the usual 'legal costs charges'. All care of LEGAL AID -> LOANS FOR REPAYMENT through the blank cheques facility: COSTS orders, issued by abusers of the courts facilities, judicial chair occupants.

Note: OPPORTUNITY was the highlighted element. We urge visitors / readers to access an explicit letter that was settled by Mr A Yiannides for other targeted 'serfs' who submitted the challenges to the offending abusers of public office & THE COURTS FACILITIES. We need only add that the abusers backed off as happened in the case of the targeted 'irrelevant male / father / discarded husband'.

Police statement evincing the fact that a Building Society indulged in the falsification of a document after it had been signed by the applicant for a loan. The targeted victim ended up as a fraudsters club recruit care of the enterprising use of the courts facilities by the legal circles as judicial chair occupants always arrange. Thus through the courts the conversion of assets. Arrogantly Organised CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY in an allegedly civilised pseudo-democracy.
Link to  brief information

The copy of the court order, below, was made available to Mr Yiannides, only at the time when settling pleadings for additional / amended petitions to the ECoHR - Strasbourg. Link to brief information as to the use of a FORGERY which the police shoved in the dark corners of the closets where ALL criminal activities, by the legal circles, are 'buried'.

Judgement / Order, which the 'victim' 'conveniently shoved in the dark corners of her perverted / corrupted mind.
Link to  brief information

Interesting Order. A third party attended the hearing, and could be asked to provide a witness statement for the day's proceedings at court. In any event the Affidavit that is challenged in our pages deals with LIES by Officers of the Supreme Court. (*
Link
Link to brief information

The DTI (Department of Trade & Industry) writes of the indebtedness of the Solicitors Indemnity Fund. The SIF allowed by all officials to carry on trading with a deficit in excess of £1.6 billion - pounds sterling. Marvel at the reasons given.

Anyone with some grey matter in his / her skull needing explanations WHY, HOW come such a debt?

Which group of persons responsible for the debt and WHY the miracle of the extensive line of credit?

Should thinkers be told WHY judicial chair occupants are party to the frauds on the budget & the REWARDS for the blackmailed stooges who FALL IN LOVE with the arrangements in place and party to more of the same FRAUDS? 

Page1

Page2

Link to   brief information

We shall relate TRUE and factual parts the police undertake and execute as part of their routine operations in an allegedly civilised state / society, one that allegedly rests and is founded on principles of Law and Order.    

Page 1

Page 2

Page 2

Link to   brief information

Amazing the reference to 'Victims' by one of the silent supporters of the abused courts' facilities for constructive frauds on 'the serfs'. The editor of 'The Sun' & a number of reporters, (I. P's) that are maintained by the paper fully aware of the facts stated in the exclusive page where we expose the arrangements in place for fraud aplenty, through the courts, and the corruption of morons.

Page 2

BELOW

Page 1

Page 2

Page 4

As part of the reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been implemented, the improved / amended pages are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@

PAGE MATERIAL (*Link to SYNOPSIS )
The DOUBLE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS Scenarios

As of 2002 we have been URGING our visitors to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to act and REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY. Our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us accessories if we kept quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the implementation of the schemes and scenarios created by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess. Visitors to this page need go no further. The activities and the evidence published in this page constituted the grounds for the submissions to the Treasury, the Home Office and the Private Office of the Prime minister. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons of Mrs. Veronica Beryl Foden's mentality and attitude to law and to the taxpayers. It is persons of her kind, those who adopt, promote and partake in such activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes against humanity, against the 'the taxpayers'. We request that you access the exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that exists care of the MOST ARROGANT OF OPEN SECRETS which successive governments have failed to address for over 34 years that we know of. 

• Visitors should access the page where we introduced and state some of the activities in which the 'victim', Mrs Veronica Beryl Foden of Plymouth, engaged in. There we cover her final act, one of the parts in the many roles she undertook FOR the constructive frauds, through the legal system and the courts. Her love for the facility for Legal Aid Certificates (so long as there exist assets for conversion to legal costs through the antics you will be reading of below) most impressive [*Link from here to the page] reminiscent of the scenarios that another star performer and member of the infamous LIPS (Litigants In Person Society) created for conversion of targeted assets to legal costs.
• We hasten to add, that the element attached to the issue of Legal Aid Certificates (covered in the brackets above) was pointed out to the 'victim'. She was also told that Legal Aid Certificates are nothing but blank cheques (for the payment of charges accrued for legal services) for clearance against assets. We informed the actress that we were very much aware of the plans of the LIPS crowd/mob, PLUS 'the arrangements by the Lord Chancellor, after extensive submissions to the Legal Aid Board about the rampant abuse of the facility. And we explained how we reported CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS BY THE LEGAL CIRCLES through use of the refugees and asylum seekers (*Links to such acknowledgements by the Lord Chancellor and the Law Society). Nonetheless the actress carried on as if blind, deaf and indifferent to the practices. She even had the nerve to telephone us, at one stage, to say that she wrote a letter to the Sunday Mirror in order to complain about the lack of such a facility to her'. This was after her extensive parts in the activities that dissipated THREE PROPERTIES through conversion to allegedly legitimate legal costs.
• We clarify that our observations, attach to and arose out of the role she assumed, as a cat. Through her contacts with us JUST ABUSE OF OUR TIME & ASSISTANCE, simply to use us in order to secure the second fraud on the taxpayers. All via the arrangements in place which, we are in a position to inform and remind one and all that: "It is the sum-total that leads to conclusive decisions".
• The actress presumed, or so she was let to believe by the managers of the LIPS crowd/mob who introduced her to us (through one of their overzealous agents in London) that she could mess around with our founder, Mr Andrew Yiannides, and treat him as a mouse. Nothing unusual, while the actors and actresses were under scrutiny and investigation for reports, such as the public can read in our pages.
• You are invited to judge for yourselves if such fraudsters ought to be encouraged to run around as 'alleged victims' of the legal system and at the same time aiming to use victims they are pointed to, for the same roles they undertook and relished in as 'fraudsters club recruits'. One only has to consider the simple fact that not one of the fraudsters we name in our pages addressed the issue of the double constructive frauds through the courts that we expose exclusively in our pages  [*Link from here to the page].
• We urge that visitors should read first the content of a letter from one solicitor to another who earlier had represented the client. The latter, simply engaged in the usual rampant constructive frauds, the industry born of and resting on fraudulent divorce court proceedings, the flagship of CIUKU Enterprises [*Link from here to the letter].
• Visitors should recognise the depth of depravity and the type of persons who are stupid enough to be used for or are enticed into a world of crime through abuse of the courts facilities, as covered in our pages.
• The events and facts, stated below, are but a typical example of the usual activities in the justice system, the courts. In particular, we draw the readers attention to the arrangements through which the makings for a society of criminals as endorsed, apparently, by the Executive in an allegedly democratic state, one that allegedly rests and is founded on law and order. [*Link from here to the evidence that qualifies our founder's conclusions well over three decades earlier. Nothing could be clearer, the Executive (our elected representatives in government) promote and assert that they ought not to interfere in the execution of judicial (note the word used, please) duties. They do not, however, inform 'the naive serfs', to whom they promote such rubbish, that THEY, our representatives, HAVE abandoned / ABROGATED the RIGHTS of the citizens TO JUSTICE. After digesting the arrogant arrangements by judicial chair occupants, access the definition of the word used by one and all *Link to and look up the element lacking in the promotion of rubbish by  NON-INTELLECTUALS* [*Link from here to an explicit revelation and 'persons who sold their all' to the corruption processes]. 
•  

DUTY TO INFORM of relevant background

Link to LIST of documents released. An open and shut case of 'Constructive Frauds' by persons who knew what they were doing all along, including the alleged victim who ENGAGED, WITH INTENT, IN BLUNT SUPPRESSION (from the taxpayers) OF THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES we expose in this and other pages. What we cover in this page are but common practices by the legal circles and by persons who operate from within such set ups as the LIPS (Litigants In Person Society) crowd/mob. LIPS is but a beehive of lovers of the systematic abuse of the courts, as covered in this page. All persons who operate out of the group, or act as affiliates of it, simply act as promoters and users of the FACILITIES FOR RAMPANT FRAUD ON Mr & Mrs. Average, in the United Kingdom. Needless to say the element of THE CORRUPTION OF IDIOTS WHO ADOPT SUCH MENTALITY & ATTITUDE TO PARLIAMENT'S LAW, as the legal circles systematically do, and as the actress / victim we expose in this page is but the crucial element at the root of ALL FRAUD & CORRUPTION that victims of the legal circles / courts are subjected to, the moment they contact solicitors in the United Kingdom.

The victim (hereinafter referred to also as VBF) informed us that she was desperate for assistance because she had a case coming up in a couple of days at the Royal Courts of Justice (access our definition for the RCJ). Her application related to divorce proceedings and an appeal in respect of the distribution of the matrimonial assets. Apparently, VBF also instigated legal proceedings against various solicitors who failed her and one of the cases had been struck out at her local County Court, in Plymouth. VBF informed us that it was only natural that SHE HAD TO appeal the strike out and a hearing, of the appeal, was pending, for a Circuit judge, in Plymouth, to deal with the merits of her application, for which needed assistance 'for sound in law submissions' were called for.

Arrangements were made for Andrew to meet with VBF and Anita Tierney in the morning of the hearing at the RCJ. Late at night, leading up to the hearing, VBF telephoned to say that a firm of solicitors were to be representing her and that they had briefed a barrister. Apparently VBF had approached a number of solicitors from a list she drew up with assistance from the Law Society. Because of the multitude of issues that were related in the telephone exchanges with VBF, Andrew informed her that he would be attending the hearing of her application, as a public gallery passer-by and observer.

VBF had informed Andrew that she had been and was in regular contact with Mrs Philomena Cullen and others of the Litignats In Person Society (the LIPS crowd/mob) and owing to the fact that she was introduced to human-rights by one of their associates, Andrew chose to delay his entry in the court-room, but observed the two persons he was to meet, from a distance, while exchanges arguments were ongoing with the legal team who were to represent VBF for the hearing. Andrew was informed later that the arguments arose out of the fact that the legal team were objecting to Ms Anita Tierney attending the hearing but, eventually, they were caused to concede that what they were insisting upon was not right. Andrew proceeded to and entered the court some ten minutes after everybody made their entries. He joined Ms A Tierney in the public gallery / seating area.

Congratulations all round for the barrister and the hard work he put in. Apparently he had been at it, all night; trying to put together the case using the paperwork as prepared by VBF, the applicant herself, and as delivered by the solicitors in the afternoon. The case 'should go, before the full bench of the Court of Appeal' was the decision of the court. Anita Tierney introducing VBF and Andrew to one another, at the conclusion of the hearing, the three proceeded to the cafeteria for exchanges on the day's events and VBF's experiences with the legal circles, etc. VBF confirmed that she did instigate various proceedings, on her own, returnable on a number of solicitors because of the wrongs imposed on her through the courts and the solicitors 'practices'. In the circumstances, she was informed of the element of Vexatious Litigant allegations being levied against her. (Andrew did not inform her that as far as we are concerned it is nothing but the ploy used in conjunction with theatrical productions in the courts, for use by sold souls who go for the carrot (rewards) at the end of the tunnel, subject to the terms and conditions stipulated in the exclusive page visitors/readers should link to from here, if not familiar with the arrangements, in place, for double constructive frauds on 'the serfs', the taxpayers / the sucker-serfs).

With Ms A. Tierney departing Andrew took VBF to the library where he photocopied an explicit Court of Appeal precedent case that related to Vexatious Litigants assertions(*Link). He explained to VBF that there is more to it than at first the charges and court 'impositions' appear to the average 'serf'. Two copies of the case were made, one for VBF and one for Andrew, in case she was to seek clarification on any issue covered in the CoA precedent case. VBF was told that she should not disclose that precedent case to any other person until she had been authorised to do so by Andrew, whose research led to the stipulations covered in the case. Introducing that case at that point was deemed essential because of the pending appeal against the strike out of the case against the solicitors. VBF was told that it was very likely that subsequent developments might warrant further appeals especially when a number of other cases were pending, all of which were against other solicitors, also. A close friend of VBF, who suffered a stroke, had been taken to the North Middlesex hospital in north London and a visit was essential. The travelling times were used for additional information from VBF and exchanges with Andrew. The understanding on the day was that VBF would go on line, join the human-rights (NGO) Community on Line and expose all that was IMPOSED ON HER BY THE LEGAL CIRCLES and everything that she had been subjected to by the courts and other 'public servants / services'.

SYNOPSIS - you will be reading of:

• HOW a firm of SOLICITORS ARRANGED IT ALL. As agents for a Building Society, while acting for a daughter, her parents and the Building Society too. With the help of 'their legal circle affiliates', in the Plymouth area, collectively they defrauded a family of their plans for the future of all. At the same time they set the wheels in motion for the best of lessons to be pointed to as learned from 'the most vile work ever to have been presented to the sons of men'. The very work relentlessly misrepresented to the naive and gullible 'serfs', everywhere, as 'holy' for over 2300 years.
• HOW THREE PROPERTIES WERE BEING CONVERTED ((through Legal Aid Certificates - LOAN (facilities) recoverable from assets targeted)) TO LEGAL COSTS 'care of the free-for-all in the courts and the protection afforded to criminals through the courts - the managers of CIUKU Enterprises'.
• HOW the Building Society gurus falsified (FORGED) one of two loan application documents and goofed by failing to falsify the other. The very 'error' denying them the right to rely on the assertions which the criminals in judicial chairs accepted as legitimate. Judicial chair occupants, acting as 'the Godfathers of Crimes Incorporated UK Unlimited' (CIUKU) Enterprises, just endorsed the criminal activities as acceptable in their courts, and in accordance with THEIR law. Nothing unusual when one considers that such criminal acts are being entertained all the way to the Court of Appeal* (*<-- readers should use the link for access to important revelations).
• HOW THE POLICE (who were caused, eventually, to investigate the activities of 'the protected organisers of 'criminal operations, in and through financial institutions and the courts') FAILED TO TAKE ACTION after confirming that a FALSIFIED - forged document was created, used and relied upon, as legitimate for promotion in support of false and inexcusable assertions. We presume that it was either because the police failed (nothing unusual) to submit their findings to the Crown Prosecution Service (Corporate body of CIUKU Enterprises) or because the CPS did not wish to instigate proceedings against 'the criminals who are protected by the Godfathers, directing and controlling it all'.
• HOW THE 'VICTIM', a perfect specimen of the LIPS crowd/mob (LIPS : Litigants In Person Society) EXHIBITED HER LOVE FOR THE DOUBLE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, while of opinion that she was a cat and the person she attached herself to (as another of the fraudsters sent along - introduced by 'the LIPS fraudsters club' to human-rights and the founder Andrew Yiannides) was a mouse to play with.
• HOW the 'victim', within days, was caught in the net that Andrew cast on the day when she was introduced to human-rights by Ms Anita Tierney an affiliate of the LIPS crowd/mob. Her subsequent actions exhibited and betrayed 'her capabilities and potential as a conniving fraudster' and a typical LIPS crowd/mobster as a tutored and conditioned stooge / charlatan.
• HOW the 'victim' was 'conveniently failing to act' as deemed essential and 'as warranted and guided', but WAS INDULGING IN OTHER ACTIVITIES through which to create and promote false scenarios care of  the services she was providing to the criminals she was working with and for, as an ass working for the carrot at the end of the tunnel'.
• HOW Andrew, the founder of human-rights, when assisting the 'victim', CAUSED THE COURT TO RE-INSTATE (on appeal, that was in the pipeline) A CASE THAT HAD BEEN STRUCK OUT. The case had been instigated by 'the victim' against the solicitors who set it all in motion.
• HOW the 'victim' was instructed to change an application to the court, on the day when the court re-instated the above stated case. She drafted the application as she determined, after she was told that it was paramount and an absolute priority that she should apply to the court for a transcript of the judgement, as delivered by the judge.
• HOW the 'victim' was conveniently failing to follow up, or chase properly, act 'appropriately' on issues that arose(!) as her cases were 'progressing'(!) in the courts (the transcript covered in the above paragraph being one). By NOT ACTING, prosecuting as she was guided, and by indulging as she, with the circles she was working with, were 'arranging', the victim 'displaying her true colours'. And along the way the 'victim' promoting and acting her parts (for and with the usual 'repetitious scripts') as the rest of 'her soul-mates in the LIPS crowd/mob' were/are indulging while fooling the suckers they are pointed and attach themselves to.
• HOW 'the victim' after failing to chase matters as she was guided to do, she set about to create scripts and happenings for and in which she and the circles she was working with were contemplating to implicate Andrew in, as the presumed architect of their childish and stupid scenarios.
• HOW the 'victim' after indulging herself as in the above paragraph covered, was CAUSED TO ACT and work with and as Andrew guided her (when under the bankruptcy threat and scenario she created) for the the documented records that Andrew was to use later (release to the government and the world jury on the Internet) in order to expose her parts and the parts of those she was working with while recklessly abusing Andrew's goodwill and assistance, FOR HER OWN ENDS & THE CRIMINALS SHE WAS WORKING WITH & FOR, and in breach of her undertakings to Andrew. Nothing unusual, just another fraudsters club recruit.
• HOW A SOLICITOR indulged himself while defending, on SIF instructions, (SIF : Solicitors Indemnity Fund) the instigators of the attack on family assets (targeted for conversion to the legal circles, through abuse of the courts facilities : the FIRST FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS = the targeted victims, also the public at large who meet 'the salaries of the fraudsters who act as protection racketeers). The aforesaid solicitor INTRODUCED A PERJURED STATEMENT (sworn affidavit) in support of the scenarios that the stupid 'victim' indulged in; nothing unusual from an ass who was after the carrot dangling on the string for the idiot and 'fraudsters club recruit'.
• HOW A SOUL-MATE OF THE 'VICTIM' in Bradford, did her best (one Carolyn, who stole floppy disks containing intellectual property, also physically assaulted Andrew) as part of the calculated obstructions. It was absolutely essential that Andrew should go to Plymouth in order to help the 'victim' to challenge the application leading to the bankruptcy that all planned, as part of the overall script / scenario which the collaborating criminals hatched up. At the time Andrew was creating the material warranted to cover and expose the scenarios that Norman Scarth 'engaged in' during the trial in Sheffield. Visitors / readers should note that it all lead to the guilty verdict care of Norman Scarth's own convenient defaults. He even failed to challenge the charges levied against him properly and at one point 'miraculously failed to act on a request by the jury' who asked to see documented evidence which HE CONVENIENTLY DID NOT ADDUCE FOR THE JURY TO PERUSE. He simply allowed the judge to waffle for a long time as the judge's part in 'the development which not one of 'the fraudsters club' was prepared for' NOR EVER MENTIONED. Worse was Norman's 'contempt for Justice itself' through his failure, the following day, to produce to the jury the copies of the requested documents, which Andrew, had taken to Bradford such documented evidence because he was under the impression that he could be called to give evidence, as if Norman was defending the charges levied against Norman Scarth. Copies were handed to Norman, to the court and to Mr Patrick Cullinane of the IBRG, an affiliate and close associate of Mr. Norman Scarth and the LIPS crowd/mob.
• The 'victim' (!) (Veronica Beryl Foden) took Andrew to another town from where she collected a large box containing documents relative to the court cases she had been involved in. At the time of the collection the receptionist inquired of Andrew if he was Mr Yiannides; the 'victim'(!) asserted later that she never told the receptionist she was being assisted by anybody on the day!!! For the visit to the solicitors the 'victim' (!) was told to request for the duplicate book where the delivery was recorded and signed for AND TO ENDORSE THE PAGE SHE SIGNED with the words 'one sealed box - unopened & unchecked'. (NOTE: The 'victim' (!) took Andrew along for the witnessing of other such collections, which the victim through her convenient defaults established without any room for doubt that she ever was likely to peruse 'the evidence' she was collecting).
• The 'victim' received and accepted also delivery of two large boxes (also containing documents) from a firm of solicitors in the Midlands; she was instructed, by ANdrew, to arrange with the solicitors (who were defending, on SIF instructions, the solicitors she instigated proceedings against) to go along to their offices with the unopened boxes with Andrew and there to open and sort/list/classify and index the documents contained in the two boxes. The contents, as retrieved from the boxes were simply described orally and the descriptions were magnetically recorded on tape cassettes as Andrew Yiannides stipulated to the 'victim' (!) IF he was going to attend / witness 'the operations the victim (!) organised with the solicitor who created and submitterd a perjured affidavit as part of 'his services to Justice'!!!
• However, the 'victim' (!) simply shoved the boxes -with the documented evidence-, in store, as she had done with all other and the earlier boxes, collected by her and or delivered to her, boxes. The victim (!) most conviently and contemptuously went on ignoring the need to prepare the essential lists warranted for service on all other parties and the courts. Thereby and thus the dreamer of a fraud gave away more of the arrangements and the undisclosed scenarios she had been involved and was engaging in as a seasoned / tutored, but stupid 'fraudsters club recruit' / stooge.
• ...

LIST OF DOCUMENTS - EVIDENCE RELEASED

• Copy of a page from the Transcript [*L] evincing the attitude of an administrator of justice and his conscious party to the theft and conversion of the assets of citizens through allegedly legitimate costs orders.
• Worse, the simple fact that the abuser of public office and judicial chair occupation made it very clear that as far as he was concerned, THE REWARD (from targeted / earmarked taxpayers contributions to the national budget) FOR KEEPING IT ALL UNDER HER HAT WAS THE ONLY WAY TO REMEDY what solicitors, barristers and judges indulged in, in contempt of the law, national and international. The arrogance of the promoter of such assertions simply reminiscent of the plans hinted at in the Old Testament.
• Scanned copy of the application for a transcript [*L] of the judgement deliberations, as delivered by HH Judge Overend. The victim most 'conveniently' ignored the very clear instructions / directions given to her on the day, minutes earlier.
• The Order [*L] of HH Judge Overend, authorising 'the creation of the transcript' requested in November 2000. It was never issued or acted upon, by the court, for months but came into being after one and all were challenged in March 2001.
• Scan of the NOTE [*L] which the 'victim'(?) transmitted to human-rights in November 2001, with copy of the Order covered in the above paragraph.
• Copy of the letter / FAX [*L] that was posted / transmitted to the recipients listed at the bottom of second page.
• Scanned copy of the Order [*L] that HH Judge Overend issued as per delivered judgement, copy of which (transcript) 'very conveniently was being obstructed' by the court with the 'victim' actress just going along and, with other known fraudsters club recruits, engaging in the usual PROMOTIONS THAT LOVERS OF *THE SYSTEM AS IS*, indulge and engage in, persistently.
• Copy of the Order, above, was transmitted on the date clearly recorded / printed by the 'victim's' facsimile equipment. NOTE the stipulation that Mr Yiannides was anxious to receive (hard copy / transcript of the Order) because of the implications.
• Visitors / readers / researchers are urged to read carefully the words used by HH Judge Overend, by accessing the page from the transcript, which the court eventually was CAUSED TO RELEASE to the  'victim' / actress. Note the blunt obstructions to 'unhindered and unadulterated justice'. Do access the Police Statement [*L] that relates to the falsification of an instrument (*F) - A FORGERY INTENDED FOR USE IN ORDER TO DEFRAUD a citizen; a forgery that was and remained irrelevant to and for one and all the way to juniors at the Home Office. All relying on and promoting the usual waffle about the independence (no interference by third parties in the execution of 'THE DUTIES OF JUDGES'. Access and read 'the convenient arrangements by the judiciary, NOT PART OF ANY LAW and IN CONTEMPT OF ALL LAW and recognise the existence of arrangements in place as concocted by the judiciary. It all amounts to freedoms, indulged into by the judiciary, who act as protection racket engineers. Further note that the 'victim' did not receive the Order, well AFTER she had transmitted the succinct document she was instructed to instigate, when and after she was under threats of bankruptcy, attached to costs she 'benefited from following applications by her that are covered in the page linked to from here.
• Copy of the Judgement / Order the 'victim' conveniently shoved in the dark corners of her perverted and corrupted mind. The 'victim', Mrs Veronica Beryl Foden, was introduced to Mr A Yiannides of human-rights by Ms Anita Tierney, an affiliate of the LIPS crowd/mob and an admirer of Mr James Todd of VOMIT repute (NOTE, our observations as to the service provided by the aforesaid 'puke production machine' were and remain clear. We concluded that he simply acts -with others in tandem- only as the SUBLIMINAL INDOCTRINATION SERVICE, for subjugation of the 'serfs' to the whims of the organisers and managers of CIUKU Enterprises). At the last minute the 'victim' benefited from the services of a firm of solicitors for the hearing of her application at the Royal Courts of Justice. Mr Yiannides, nonetheless, attended, as observer, the hearing that related to the distribution of matrimonial assets, as determined by a DISTRICT judge in the 'victim's' case. Thereafter, the 'victim' benefited from plenty of guidance and assistance, from Mr Yiannides, in order to challenge all manner of wrongdoing and failures by the firm of solicitors, who eventually applied to be removed from the court's records at the R.C.J. The solicitors excuse / justification: 'because, they maintained, the client had not given instructions and or because she was not 'accepting their proposed course of action'. Most interestingly they were to abandon her a few days before a hearing of her appeal was due before a full panel of the Court of Appeal.
• An order with interesting misrepresentations, nothing but arrogant falsehoods BY THE COURT, a JUDGE. The order was issued by the court when the actress, ('the fraudsters club recruit and stooge') was assisted to challenge the attempt to declare her bankrupt. She acknowledged the falsehoods that are asserted in the FALSE INSTRUMENT, a Court Document lacking accountability : not reflecting the truth / the facts of the matter, but she was just happy to let things be. She did nothing about the issues she was pointed to and, typically 'promoted the type of scripts that 'fraudsters club recruits' engage in, relentlessly. Nothing but CO-OPERATION with the abusers of public office and the courts facilities. Nothing but theatrics for the creation of THE SECOND FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, with 'alleged victims' indulging in convenient defaults and conscious parties to FRAUD with abuse of the trust and assistance they secure from others, added to the parts such evil persons entertain / take on. The actress was handed a box of evidence that had been sent to the court, directly, by one of the many offending firms of solicitors who engaged in the rampant constructive frauds, through abuse of the courts' facilities. Like all other LIPS (Litigants In Person Society) affiliates of hers, the fraudsters club recruit, was simply ready, willing and able to promote the powers that be. No challenges and no exposures in the public domain (in breach of the agreement she entered into with Mr Andrew Yiannides of *human-rights*) while servicing the subliminal indoctrination arrangements, in partnership with the abusers of public office. Just a hypocrite AND A FRAUD WHO SUBSEQUENTLY ASSERTED THAT THE EVIDENCE (box) HANDED TO HER she was 'stupid enough to deliver to the other side because, 'allegedly', she was so ordered to do by a judge. She named the judge but never confirmed any of the assertions in writing or produced any evidence in support of her assertions.
• The copy of the order by HH Judge Overend when he was caused to restore to the court's list the action / claim that was struck out before the actress/dreamer/fraudster Mrs Veronica Beryl Foden was introduced by the LIPS crowd/mob to Mr A. Yiannides. She / the court conveniently suppressed the document, from us, for months. It was only made available to Mr Yiannides when he was called upon to assist with and help settle additional (ongoing violations) and amendments to pleadings for Petitions to the European Court of Human Rights. The issue that was uppermost in Mr Yiannides' mind, when he instructed the 'victim' (who was recognised to have been co-operating with those she was complaining of about in the activities she contacted us for) to apply for a transcript of the judgement delivered by HH Judge Overend, clear: "... the allegation of forgery - remains struck out as an abuse of process" (Food for thought for Jeffrey Archer who was sent to prison for a  lesser crime). NOTE also the following:
      (1) Victim acting alone (no mention of Mr Yiannides' presence as the victim arranged through lack of request for a litigation friend THEREBY GIVING AWAY HER PART & THE PLANS for Mr Yiannides, by the alleged victim and those she was working with and for).
      (2) Contempt for Parliament's Law AND Judges prime duty* [*Link]. Forgery created & used for theft of properties and denial of rights including protection from crime and criminals > all care of the legal circles INCLUDING JUDICIAL CHAIR OCCUPANTS with the police playing the fiddle for the sucker-victims dancing all the way to the REWARDS UNDER THE TABLE,. so long as the victims are guided and used by ex-victims who converted to the system of operations* as we cover in our pages [*Link from here to explicit proof that the judiciary and the courts are party to it all]. BLUNT CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, as organised and endorsed by officers of Justice & the Law.
      (3) Arrogant breaches of the Judicial Oath* [*Link] and breaches of Public Duty*. [*Link from here to the image of the Order issued by HH Judge Overend in the margin panel on the left].
• The headlines covering the address of the Prime Minister at the annual Conference of the New Labour Party, in October 2004, were indicative of messages intended for our attention and consideration. As the case and the parts played by the fraudster (Mrs Veronica Beryl Foden) in this case unfolded, partly covered in this and other pages, it becomes very clear >even to most simple of illiterates in law< that the original plans of 'the family of the sons of men' in this instance were intended to serve to meet the needs of the family WITHOUT ANY IMPOSITIONS ON THE TAXPAYERS. It matters not if the stooge and fraudster was sent along as a blackmailed stooge or as a willing playmate in all that she was complaining of and about. Her wilful and maligned attitude to the person she was sent along to entrap (as if she was capable & attempted), HER RELENTLESS AND INEXCUSABLE FAILURES & MOST CONVENIENT DEFAULTS, OMISSIONS & FAILURES TO ACT AS SHE HAD BEEN AND WAS BEING GUIDED TO DO, gave her away. She was, after all, just another puppet and a lousy actress who could not deal with issues en suite WITHOUT HER MENTORS ON HAND. All she was interested in was the reward under the table for HER PART as a fraudsters club recruit.
• Over and above the aforesaid, she was doing her best, as a tutored and guided fraudster (an illiterate in law and court practise charlatan) engaging in childish attempts (applications to courts) that were intended to create scenarios and false instruments (care of the criminals in judicial chairs) through which to discredit the person she was sent along to mess about with.
• ALL THE WHILE she was maintained BY THE TAXPAYERS through Social Security, as arranged by the criminals who organised it all for AND WITH HER. Precisely the situation with many another fraudsters club recruit.
• Visitors / readers / researchers are urged to access and read the tongue in cheek approach to the FACILITIES PROVIDED FOR THE PLAYMATES AND LOVERS OF THE SYSTEM AS IS* [*Link from here to the transcript of telephone exchanges when one of the 'fraudsters club recruits' specifically spoke of Andrew Yiannides' knowledge..... which Andrew was wasting..... by NOT joining in the type of activities the two were pro-active in..... using NEW VICTIMS of the legal circles and their cases of corrupt abuse of the courts facilities, all and everything INTENDED TO LEAD TO THE TYPE OF REWARDS we expose in the exclusive page* [*Link] which alleged legal gurus of the mentality of the two 'genies' were gifted with, on ADOPTING the method of operations through the abused courts facilities].
• Access and read of the facts of life in our allegedly civilised pseudodemocracy, one of many created by the followers of the Old Testament rubbish, busy for decades / centuries creating the New World Order,. Marvel at the facts of life we point to as covered by the fraudster Mr Norman Scarth when a recording (by his caller) of telephone exchanges reveal much. The two COVERED AND EXPOSED MUCH as ONLY TRUE MAINTENANCE ENGINEERS OF THE SYSTEM AS IS, could do. The caller was the fraudster Mr Johan Michael Foenander who, like Norman Scarth and Veronica Beryl Foden NEVER REPORTED PROPERLY the criminal activities they were (and probably still are) speaking of as alleged victim-challengers WHILE IN PURSUIT OF THE REWARDS UNDER THE TABLE FOR FRAUDSTERS CLUB RECRUITS. 
• Scan image of a Copy of a Section 9 Statement by the police where the alterations to the signed document were/are reported by the police. Typically. the police failed to exercise their public duties. [*Link to the image in the left panel/window & *Link to another case when Lord Justices at the Court of Appeal simply acted in contempt of Parliament's Law and the evidence they were handling - A FORGERY].
•  

   BELOW COPY OF THE ORDER WHEN THE ACTION AGAINST THE SOLICITORS WAS RE-INSTATED TO THE COURT'S LIST.
   Mr Andrew Yiannides, attended the hearing of an appeal by the victim, as litigation friend and as observer for the occasion; he had to shout aloud to the actress, Veronica Beryl Foden, that it was her duty to point out to the Judge that a particular document was a blunt FORGERY. Mr Yiannides ACTED, as the occasion commanded, BECAUSE of her earlier failings and ARROGANT DEFAULTS attached to the terms she had agreed to in respect of the assistance and the purpose for same on Mr Andrew Yiannides' part and contribution* [*Link from here to 'DUTY TO CHALLENGE JUDGE' principle, as reported years later]. Her failures rendered her party to the abused court facilities because of her reckless and WILFUL SUPPRESSION of evidence, pertaining to criminal activities she, allegedly had simply been , as she was asserting and maintaining, 'just an innocent victim' and asserted that she was not 'a lover-sucker', who was party to any of the organised fraud intended to lead to the arranged conditional rewards under the table for persons who play the field by agreeing to join 'the network of fraudsters clubs' the AIMS OF WHICH IS TO USE OTHER VICTIMS OF THE LEGAL CIRCLES for the wonderful world of 'institutionalised fraud-a-plenty', we point to and expose in the exclusive page she was referred to from the onset*. (*F2).
   It befell upon Mr Andrew Yiannides to point out the arrogant contempt of and for the law by the licensed criminals and the sold to the devil souls, of the mentality of Mrs Veronica Beryl Foden and her associates (from within the LIPS crowd), also their affiliates, all of whom were organising themselves in networks of alleged legal gurus, operating out of other beehives of organised actors engaging in fraud aplenty on the taxpayers, through abuse of the courts facilities.