the Community On Line and work with others for and in the necessary challenges and exposures for the common good. Link to Information Page

The visitor's attention is drawn to the words of Jesus Christ, attributed to Him by the editors / creators of The Gospel according to St. Luke. Access His words to the lawyers some 2000 years ago. Many the dignitaries who shared His views over the two millennia  (*Link).

'The Times' article below in line with submissions made by our founder in 1995 in the course of the Festival of Rights.

The submissions to the debate 'Can We Trust The Judges' covered precisely the very issue and were welcome by those present.

Below the covers from the Festival of Rights programme.

Our founder attended the event, in 1995. Notably the organisers promoted the adage, from classical times, whereby the written word was and remains the most powerful weapon that man ever devised. More powerful than plutonium the slogan on the back cover declares!

We publish also the page and point to the entry covering the debate when delegates and representatives of organisations who attended took part in the debate.  Our founder's submissions, were well received by delegates and members in the audience. The submissions were repeated in a letter to the Rt. Hon. Paul Boateng, the Parliamentary Spokes-person in Legal Affairs for New Labour, in opposition at the time. Years later the submissions were reflected through the above headlines and we have no doubt that the government will be attending to the very issue, as a matter of priority IF JUSTICE IS TO BE SERVED AS THE GOVERNMENT INDICATED & PROMISED  in 1995.

Team for the debate Can We Trust The Judges'

Below Mr  Boateng's response on reading the condensed material of 'The Breeding Grounds - case' which he received from Mr. A Yiannides subsequent to the debate and the submissions from the founder of human-rights

TWENTY-FOUR years earlier our founder determined that justice was just a word and that such a service DID NOT EXIST in the United Kingdom. He  had witnessed much in the course of activities by the legal circles, over six years at the Royal Courts of Justice.  It was a case of solicitors, barristers and judges acting IN BREACH OF CRIMINAL LAW. They secured, used and promoted false instruments and even BLUNT FORGERIES in order to corrupt and pervert justice, in association with others. It was immaterial if because of invisible services by the TRIAD to the instigator of the original fraud who was to rely on the best the managers of CIUKU Enterprises do offer and provide to and for criminals to benefit from.

In the process the ordinary citizen is treated with the same contempt as Parliament's Laws and as the controllers of the Law Enforcement Agencies have been arranging for centuries and millennia. (Link) For the capabilities of the Legal Professions link to /courts.htm#transcript & recognise why the founder of human-rights, in the course of 1972 to 1975 determined to EXPOSE the arrogant constructive frauds the citizens fall prey to when they seek justice.

VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY; our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us accessories if we kept quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the implementation of the schemes by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess; it was such a person who had been wasting our time and securing support through many a crocodile tear.  You will find the addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes. We refer to our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious, law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET. 

Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive material: access instructions.  

As part of the reconstruction process our new pages (and pages where changes and additions have been implemented, the improved / amended pages) are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes, at the top of the left column/margin, below the file name (*....xxxxx.htm *). The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant material in the page and or in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@

• The much revered independence of the judiciary.
• A Judiciary that is free to ignore the Law and the evidence lodged / presented at court.
• Marvel at the capabilities of persons, from within the Lord Chancellor's department.
• They promote assumed rights, for judicial chair occupants, the public's servants, to breach [*Link] CRIMINAL LAW, with impunity!
• All intending THEIR PRACTICES, to lead to the compensation culture, syndrome [*Link] to the exclusive page where we expose the constructively engineered DOUBLE FRAUD on the taxpayers).
• Practices, activities, and arrangements developed by the administrators [*Link] of CIUKU Enterprises.
• All for and in their own interests, through abuse of public office! [*Link from here to brief legal argument on available Law that covers 'false instruments lacking accountability by the creators / authors of such].
• One and all, from within the Law Enforcement Agencies, simply co-operating with one another, or serving in and for the same cause:
• The conversion of the assets of the citizens to their circles! (We have released Particulars & EVIDENCE covering the participation of 'an alleged victim' [*Link] who was observed and noted to have been engaging in THE DOUBLE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, as covered exclusively in our pages).
• Victim citizens, treated as serfs of the Middle Ages by the modern days, self-appointed, 'Masters & Lords' of 'days gone by'.
• AND the victims abandoned, by all, to their own devices, to submit PETITIONS to the European Court of Human Rights. [*Link]
• Applications / Petitions FOR COMPENSATION as intended, by one and all, even by 'alleged' [*Link] victims. (The link takes the visitor to an introduction we published covering the parts of an alleged victim who was WORKING FOR the double fraud on the taxpayers. Accusing the media and her Member of Parliament, for lack of interest, yet she was ignoring her rights to REPORT CRIMES TO THE WORLD after the police also exhibited their usual best. The criminal activities she was raising only in a closed circuit, just like the fraudsters who introduced her to *human-rights*).
• The victims, the successful ones, then expected to behave as we point you to, and WE EXPOSE TO THE WORLD [*Link from here to the facilities in place for the double fraud on 'the serfs', who pay taxes for constructive frauds through the courts).
• The best of CIUKU Enterprises! TAXES FOR DOUBLE FRAUD.

The victim-citizen's response and observations below the letter's image:-

It was clear the author of the letter needed to go back to school to learn English; the Lord Chancellor received such a suggestion from the victim - citizen. Odd that years later, a person sitting in a judicial capacity exhibited similar capabilities and knowledge of the queen's English, in the long drawn-out Ebert 'bankruptcy through false instruments' saga [*Link from here to legal explanation].

Needless to say the author was patronising. Note: 'may I suggest'.... from an illiterate who probably got promoted for the brilliant ways in which he treats victims of corrupt practices in the courts, which the Lord Chancellor maintains with such brilliant assistants as the author of the letter on the right.

The citizen complains about serious issues such as corrupt practices (the abuse of office simply to  generate income for the circles from within which judges in the United Kingdom arise to public office) and the citizen is treated with contempt and or as a moron by an illiterate. 

Do not fail to note the reference to the existence of an alleged constitution in the country that had NONE apart from the Magna Carta, and even that was abolished on joining the EEC. The citizen over a decade on is still waiting to hear from the author of the letter where copy of this countries(?) written constitution can be secured. 

FURTHER NOTE that the author, a presumed well versed in the available public services (the CAB in the instance covered in the letter) knows not that the service he was referring to is the ADVICE bureau and not an ADVANCE bureau. Perhaps in the author's mind all from within the Lord Chancellor's Department were as advanced in ENGLISH and LAW as in the 'ways to cover up corruption' as the author of the letter to the victim exhibited.   It is clear that the author himself SIGNED the letter; one can further deduce that the author was as careful and DILIGENT when he was reading the citizen's DETAILED complaint as when the author was reading the letter he is presumed to have dictated to another within the Lord Chancellors Department. Furthermore that other person was/is as illiterate in English as the author of the letter. The author is also presumed to have been as DILIGENT and careful as the judge/judges he hastened to absolve of any wrong doing. Besides the unwritten Constitution of the United Kingdom could provide for THE JUDGES TO BE INDEPENDENT OF PARLIAMENT'S LAW.

The letter below was received from the Lord Chancellor's department in response to serious complaints. Read the letter and link to relevant facts we cover in this and other pages. Access the page where we briefly state the facts attached to the serious complaints. Link to the page from the paragraph you first link to below, from here.

The obvious:-
(a) "this" in the singular, 
(b) "countries" in the plural
(c) the apostrophe in the plural goes after the 's' and not before the 's'. (*F1)

• The letter above, was sent to the victim of ALL, in "The Breeding Grounds - case," [*Link to the page]
• Link to an explicit Appeal, that was called for in the case which we publish in our pages for victims of the practices to know of and recognise INTENT through reckless defaults and wilful intent. The PLEADED REALITIES & CHALLENGES are made public in order that visitors / readers should get to know of the practices from within the Law Enforcement Agencies, among them the Metropolitan Police.
• Public servants (police and county court staff/officers*) decided the 'victim family of four' HAD NO RIGHTS in Law. So did the Magistrates Courts staff and officers along with the Bailiffs services, the courts maintain, AFTER the citizen caused one and all to prosecute the criminal who indulged as he pleased or as guided / used. Needless to say THE POLICE ENCOURAGED & PROMOTED it all relentlessly while the courts staff and officers were aiming for nothing else but for more of the same. ALL IN ALL, simply activities and defaults INTENDED FOR OTHER SERVICES.
• "The self-perpetuating cancerous growth industry"©, The pride of creation BY AND FOR the administrators of CIUKU Enterprises.
• The freedom of the judiciary, the police and every other public servant who do not feel duty bound, as always, to uphold and serve the law, but to endorse and promote the decisions of the lowest of the low (a young constable, a District Judge etc.).
• The evidence against such public servants and 'the invisible services they provide', through defaults in the execution of their public duties, are covered in this and other web-sites.
• The offending abusers of public office cannot run away, from their responsibilities. False instruments for theft of properties? [*Link to The Law]
• The relevant pages, cover the material which the author of the letter received, and the realities can no longer be treated as 'family issues' for the closet of CIUKU Enterprises [*Link].
• Judge for yourself as to the quality of service from within the Lord Chancellor's office and the Department he is meant to oversee and supervise through responsible delegates and not through illiterates in English and law. [*Link to a late 2001scenario].
• Recognise why the conclusion: "Nothing but  impositions for the income generating scenarios for the benefit of the circles from within which they arose to public office. Occupying JUDICIAL chairs and acting as unwise Solomon's and in contempt of the law, the evidence and the judicious oath". 

Access and read of the duty and function of any Judge [*Link] in the UK.  In our book the invitation by the court carries with it the elements of a blunt CONSPIRACY in the making.

The above is dedicated to all who wasted their time for the demonstrations outside courts for and in respect of 'The Secret Briefings'

Evidently the department's policy provides for public servants to uphold the rights of all judicial chair occupants to act as they please and to serve other 'vested' interests, not justice. They act as they please through contempt for the law and evidence.

Our pages, and cases being published on the Internet, expose very vividly the practices* and the vested interests that are served by abusers of public office.

The victim-citizen who received the above letter recognised that it was but a case of 'run of-the-mill' waffle and ill conceived promotions.

Periodic attempts were made to contact the author but without success. He might perhaps read these pages and consider that HE was called upon to deal with the issues attached to, and arising out of  'The Breeding Grounds - case"*. He might reconsider his 'contemptuous response' to the victims of all. He might, perhaps, come up with some legally feasible explanations that could justify the attempts to obstruct and PERSISTENTLY DENY JUSTICE TO THE VICTIMS OF CRIME.

The old established, and relied upon, practices, by, from and within the legal circles (the legal professions and the courts) no longer hold against the realities of public exposure [*Link] and scrutiny.

Countless the cases coming forward. The theatres....  the theatres.... their theatres...., the badly rehearsed and badly promoted SCRIPTS & SCENARIOS (resting on misuse of and MISCONDUCT in public office* [Link]) are subject to review by truly independent 'jurors', the world over. 

• We refer you to our founder's brief introduction to the exclusive page on ISSUES OF LAW and in particular the THEFT OF PROPERTIES, INCLUDING RIGHTS IN LAW, through false instruments. [*Link]
• Indictable offences [*Link from here to LAW APPLICABLE when abusers of judicial chair occupation act in contempt of the law] &
• The Police pro-active in criminal activities, [*Link from here to page where we point to FALSIFIED RECORDS by the police, as acknowledged by a senior officer who conveniently was removed from the investigation]
• The Crown Prosecution Service recklessly irresponsible, [*Link from here to challenges in writing to the CPS noted to have been conscious party to fraudulently created court proceedings, as clarified in the letter / challenges]
• The Director of Public Prosecutions indifferently blind and deaf, [As of 1972 when Mr Andrew Yiannides got to know of the rampant constructive fraud on the serfs, through abuse of the courts' facilities. *Link from here to evidence, the use of a FORGERY in support of a non-existent, and nonetheless concocted Defence]
• The Attorney General invited to consider the law we point to, [*Link]
• The Victim-Citizen's Representatives in Government, [*Link]
• The Home Office and a Minister who considers submissions [*Link]
• The Lord Chancellor and his Department contemptuous of the law and the evidence. [*Link]
• All as INDIFFERENT TO THE CRIME and LAW as ever? [*Link]
• We believe not. We refer you to our submissions to the authorities. [*Link]
• It was after we caught the last hireling / stooge who was sent along by the LIPS crowd/mob to abuse and waste our time (like others before her) while she was to work for and from within the circles who organise the CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS ON THE BUDGET - OUR TAXES. [*Link]
•  

ANY WONDER WHY we determined to expose it all to the world through the provisions we created [*Link] for the victims of the TRIAD?

DO NOT OVERLOOK the simple fact that the Law was used in the case of the corruption and perversion of Justice through use of a false instrument - the other Diary that was the central element in the prosecution of Lord Jeffrey Archer.

We expect, and demand, of the police to get on with their public duties, in the cases we will draw their attention to, BEGINNING WITH THE THREE FORGERIES used and relied upon by the staff, the officers and the employees of the police at Haringey. We expect of them to attend to the fraudulent conversions and the misappropriation of the Housing Benefit Funds at and by Haringey Council officers while they were relying and benefiting from abuse of the courts' facilities at Edmonton County Court, as staff and officers indulged, freely and as administrators of the arrangements by the organisers of CIUKU Enterprises.

We expect of the police to trace and recover the funds. If they cannot do so, through typical incompetence manner and or because of additional defaults and omissions, we expect of them TO SUBMIT A FULL REPORT TO THE HOME SECRETARY, in order that he may arrange for appropriate compensation to the targeted victims (plural intended) of institutionalised crime.

We shall be looking to the Home Secretary to ensure that Parliament attends to the issue of the alleged independence and rights of judicial chair occupants to indulge, as they do, SIMPLY for theft of properties and the rampant conversion of assets and the perpetuation of court cases through false instruments (Link) leading to warranted appeals (as the authors of the false instruments intend) and   as the victims always are directed to seek through members of the legal circles, who INDULGE AND ENTERTAIN THE FREE FOR ALL THAT ABOUNDS THROUGH 'FRAUD IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM'.

• The civil justice system in England and Wales is the adversarial model.
• In the adversarial process the opposing sides confront one another in front of a presiding judge.
• Through their respective arguments the parties assist the judge to reach a conclusion as to the truth of 'the facts in dispute' and to apply the law to those facts". (APPLY THE LAW *is* the operative word / state)

However read at the top of most pages [*Link] of arrogant assertions by the judiciary in the United Kingdom (no doubt in other pseudodemocracies too) whereby, allegedly, they have inherent jurisdiction to STAY PROCEEDINGS taken before them in respect of an act of state, including, naturally acts of public servants who engage in implementation of undeclared policies, as for instance in the rampant housing benefit fraud on targeted members of society such as retired persons whose properties (ex residential homes) are occupied by new stock of imported 'refugees and asylum seekers' of different cultures and religion. All and everything care of long ongoing plans for mankind (*F2) and clandestine congregations / meetings of secretive brotherhoods and alleged Humanitarian Organisations including Religious Institutions, Charities and Non Governmental Organisations the members of which, know not what goes on behind the scenes and what powers the strings above them. 

FOOTNOTE:-
Footnote eXtra: In October 2010, the coalition's Attorney General, in an interview published by 'COUNSEL' specifically spoke of the police distancing themselves from cases of (small-fry) fraud and asserted that he was making that element his department's priority. IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN, WHAT the coalition of the Con-LibDems, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY, WILL IN FACT ATTEND TO THE RAMPANT FRAUD. IF IT WILL DEAL APPROPRIATELY with the criminals who abuse public office, especially when faced with appropriate submissions and claims that will be delivered in due course. Visitors/readers are urged to read the article published in the London Evening Standard, as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003 [*Link from here to the article we reproduce in another webpage and consider "Why tolerate the arrogance of the legal circles who had and have the audacity to assert to the lawmakers that the lawmakers have nothing to do with the law"]. While there, above it, the explicit letter to ex-Minister, the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. ALL alleged victim-challengers who contacted Andrew Yiannides, by the time the letter was sent to the Minister, received copy of the letter just as they received copies of other letters submitted to government maintained Ministers and other official appointees to public office. Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance. It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when called upon properly in truly democratic states. The above in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and among such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens that led to the right actions by governments, the explicit challenges when we set about exposing one of the most evil of alleged victims of the legal circles to have ever contacted us [*Link to our explicit submissions to (a)  the Prime Minister, (b) the Chancellor / Treasury, (c) the Home Secretary. WE acted so after we had secured more than enough evidence about the parts of an alleged victim whose only interests were (i) the rewards under the table FOR KEEPING QUIET about the ORGANISED FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES and (ii) her parts in blunt attempts that were intended to discredit the person she was sent along to mess about with, Mr Andrew Yiannides]. Access please the letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1998 [*Link from here to the letter] and note the results evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal) also within days of the letter reaching its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges -lovers and 'promoters of the system as is'- on the job for decades; one and all acting as sold souls always do [*Link from here to the evidence we point to relative to the parts of one of a number of sold to the system fraudsters who were sent along / introduced to Andrew Yiannides by the managers / organisers of the LIPS crowd / mob].
    1.    We draw our visitors attention to the above elements in order that they consider the realities Andrew points to. If, by any chance, any ever cross paths with Mr Norman Scarth they should point him to the very elements and to enquire of him: 'Since you were pointed to such realities and realisations, and since uou were pointed, also, to the letter from the Rt. Hon. Paul Boateng - copy of which he secured under false pretences and later ATTEMPTED TO ABUSE FOR HIS EVIL ENDS - can he explain away his persistent propositions and suggestion to Andrew to use the KISS principle? Apparently Mr Scarth's teachers had been advocating to Mr Scarth, decades ago, to use and benefit from the principle. Persons who, like Andrew, never heard of the KISS principle we inform them that 'KISS', evidently, stands for Keep It Simple Stupid. *Link from here to the image of the brief letter from the Rt. Hon. Paul Boateng, to Andrew Yiannides and then access the page / URL linked to from here. Then consider also, the reality, that consequential to Andrew's submissions, in writing, to the Stephen Lawrence Enquiry (as listed under 'The CAMILA Project' in the final report), the LEGAL ACTION GROUP wrote to Mr Andrew Yiannides and asked for permission to use the material published at this website as their letter accessible from here establishes. We expect of the genuinely concerned to enquire of Mr Scarth and any of his chums / affiliates whom they are in contact with, and know of them to be operating as alleged legal experts who allegedly are challenging the blunt abuse of the courts facilities for the rampant fraud we expose in our exclusive page, AND THE CORRUPTION OF PERSONS OF HIS / THEIR GRASP OF THE LAW to inform us all where in the public domain are they - any of them - publishing any evidence in support of their challenges to the abusers of the legal system, the abusers of the facilities of the courts AND THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE? Period.  
    2.   Readers, researchers visitors and victim-challengers who read here / in other web-pages, of 'long ongoing plans for mankind' must understand that nothing is asserted, by the author, without foundations. Interested parties and persons who hear others or themselves speak of the New World Order, need to recognise that such states (plans for) have existed for centuries / millennia. One need only consider Hitler's own references to a New Order and the fact that mankind was faced with a WORLD WAR for the second time within 20 years from the end of the first to the beginning of the second. Two world wars within the first half of the 20th century; conflicts and wars ongoing for millennia not always founded / resting on greed but the element of power-mongering always part of the equation and in the process the managers of the respective states withjin their knowledge plunging the respective sucker-serfs they represnet deeper and deeper into debt. Readers who have accessed material where we point to the origins of the 'Divide & Manipulate, manage, control 'the sons of men' are familiar with the fact that the root of the very ploy was used by the creators of the Old Testament, rubbish. Yet for over 2300 years (as of the days when the alleged Holy Scriptures from and about the chosen peoples -12 TRIBES-  of the alleged creator of all and everything INCLUDING THE VERY PLOY NATURALLY, no one has ever pointed out the elements pointed to in an article at http://www.justiceraped.org/2011/06/334 where the issue and reality about the very Old Testament rubbish, referred to as 'the alphabet' from which THREE LABNUAGES were created, the languages bewing JUDAISM, CHRISTIANITY and Islam not to mention all other splinter groups and new extensions of each one. A simple question by the author of the aforesaid article (Diogenis) WHY THE RIVERS OF BLOOD AND THE WARMONGERING from the followers of the same deity? In due course 'the plans of old (written of in the Old Testament) by the criminals who created the alleged creator of all and everythting and delivered man a foul scenario through the content of their vile work will be made clerarer for anyone who is gebuinekly concerned about THE CRIMINAL IMPOSITIONS THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COPURTS FACILITIES. We are pointing in our pages to existing material, published at the beginging of the 20th century in Russia which the followers of the alleged creator of all and everything simply denounced as false. NO ONE CAN, HOWEVER, when and IF pointed to the script / extract from the Old Testament we reporoduce in our pages cxould ever assert and proclaim that vile scenario and script attributed to the very alleged creator of all and everything. Link from here to the Old Testament extract and after reading of the MACHINATION FROM THE EVIL ONE (from the ones who created the alleged creator of all and everything) CONSIDER THAT THERE EXIOST MANY VILE, EVIL, CRIMINAL ACTS & ACTIVITIES in the Old Testament scenarios and acripts, inclusive of the explicit one we point to in the page where we relate HOW A CARING AND DAUGHTER was treated by the followers of the evil one. DO ACCESS the page and after considering the realities where the linl from here takes scroll up in the page and have a good look at the Coat of Arms for the city of the founding fathers -Plymouth- and note the references to the one and only represented by one of the tower ssymbols..... THEN WAKE UP READER / victim / sucker-serf. Thereafter access some of the other extracts from the vile Old Testament scripts Andrew Yiannides copied and has been pointing to at http://www.family.uk-human-rights.org/intro.htm for well over a decade.
    3.   xxx