IMPORTANT Update/ADDENDA: January 2002

•     The situation in and with our Law Enforcement Agencies has been so for centuries. Refer to William Shakespeare* and to Charles Dickens* and their views. It is likely to be so in perpetuity if 'the wily and crafty victims' of the organised Fraud through the courts carry on endorsing it all as we cover in the exclusive page* and other pages we publish at this website.

•     Dealing with the issue of 'the real shysters'*, the persons who join the fraudsters' club by choosing to ignore the thousands of victims going through the grinding mills day in, day out, pains us. The personal greed of such persons takes precedent over the suffering of others.

•     Their silence is sold for thirty pieces of silver and it represents the moral code they adopt on joining 'the fraudsters club; the adopted moral code, precisely that which they set out complaining about by alleging and asserting their readiness to expose it all. Misleading others and securing, under false pretences, support from the persons they target*, they simply act as their mentors, those they set about to complain and expose in the first instance.

•     We uncover such activities and scenarios in our pages. It is for the visitor and reader of these pages to recognise that GREED rules supreme while mankind is suffering through and because of such an amoral (Link) code*.

•     All care of the new breed of legal experts the Lord Chancellor was excited about when he appeared before the Home Affairs Select Committee in November 1999.(Link)

2

For further assistance & clarification contact: webmaster

6.   Victim wrote to Lord Chancellor and challenged blunt malpractice by court staff. An invitation to court under false pretences, obstructions to victim to benefit from assistance by litigation friend. Blunt default by judge to address application by the victim with contempt for the affidavit and supporting evidence. The FACTS & DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE that were lodged at court, and much more were submitted to the European Court of Human Rights. The venue had been moved and there was a change of judge, at the last minute, in order to obstruct witnesses attending the 'venue'. There were failures to acknowledge and or deal with letters attached to and arising out of rights denied and obstructed by persons who misconduct in public office. The victim will be publishing and making public the full content of the letter with all material facts and evidence ready for release to the condescending press barons and for the world at large to marvel at the "force for good" generated from within the power houses in the United Kingdom. Access the victim's Community On Line web-site at: http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org and acquaint yourselves with the full content of the STATED FACTS & PLEADED VIOLATIONS lodged at the ECoHR.

• 7.    Government Announces Statutory Instrument intended to monitor the conduct of Local Authority Councillors. Victims of the free for all and the distribution of the Housing Benefit funds by and through the corrupt and the corrupted, will be publishing more documented evidence. They will be exposing the activities from within the Local Authorities, from within the local county courts and from within the local police. In the meantime we invite you to access the all new *free for all* page we created around the press release of 30th July 2001.
• The delay was caused by the fact that we had been pre-occupied with the activities of members of the LIPS crowd who sough to railroad and hijack our work. Persons who were under pressure and we had been assisting to challenge the malpractice in their situations, like Mr Norman Scarth, determined to abduct Andrew's work and use it in an unbefitting manner evincing childish and reckless use of the work of others. Full particulars will be published in due course. In the meantime visit the web-pages that Andrew was creating for Norman at the time.(Link)
• Then consider what Andrew was caused to abandon as soon as Andrew  recognised that Norman had been engaging with others in undisclosed agendas. Through misrepresentations and theatrical productions he had been securing assistance from and at the expense and waste of the time of Andrew. Norman simply was working with others for other than their joint proclamations and intentions to challenge and expose the practices in the legal and courts services. Particulars will be published in due course.
• In the meantime visit the all revealing page *2lipstalk.htm* and recognise from the exchanges how the first LIP ('J') set out to generate 'friction between co-operating challengers' (Andrew - Norman - Scriven). Note how the second LIP was guiding his caller to: "Go down 'the income for others' road as I, second." We need only add, at this point in time, that the first one who abandoned a straight appeal and went down the avenue 'his mate' was seconding, contacted Andrew 15 months later. He requested of Andrew an affidavit and was DEMANDING of Andrew to DEFAULT in the Statement from and by Andrew (in other words suppression of material facts and documented evidence) in order to suit the plans of the NEW GURUS who discovered how to draft scenarios for theatrical presentations in the theatres of abducted 'Justice'.

7A. Local Authorities The government announced, in November 2001, the introduction of a new Statutory Instrument: 2001 No. 3575, "The Local Authorities (Model Code of Conduct) (England) Order 2001. (The Order was made by The Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions. The order was made on the 5th, laid before Parliament on the 6th and came into force on 27th November 2001). There you have it friends: MINISTERS CAN ACT when and if they want to apply the laws we all know are breached by public servants. At least that is what the presentation through the media barons confirms this simple fact. It is another issue HOW the Police and the Courts CHOOSE to apply and or ignore facts, evidence and 'The LAW'.

8. DENIALS of Rights: ( County Court ) Court Order Issued endorsed with Andrew's name and Andrew was denied a copy by the person he had been assisting for well over a year! One only has to consider that the person was introduced to Andrew by a member of the LIPS crowd/mob. Letters were sent to ALL offenders who indulged in 'undisclosed machinations', and all letters are now being published as PROOF OF THE CONSPIRACIES between the abductors and rapists of Justice (the Goddess) and 'asses who love the carrot dangling at the end of the tunnel'. In the meantime we publish our challenges to an affidavit that a solicitor settled, filed at court and served on the targeted victim that Andrew was assisting for well over a year. Note, please that 'the victim' (introduced by the LIPS crowd/mob - remember) did not give a copy of the affidavit to Andrew. Access the file */chaldep1.htm* and marvel at some of the revelations and the attempts by the fraudsters. Do not fail to consider what actually happened when and after Andrew decided to act, subsequent to the victim asserting that she could not recollect another order. That other, was issued by the court at a time when Andrew saved 'the victim' some £1700 pounds (legal costs script as per application lodged at court by another firm of solicitors). On that occasion Andrew established (in the High Court) that 'the victim's' rights, in law, had been breached and that Justice HAD BEEN & WAS BEING OBSTRUCTED by a firm of solicitors who allegedly had been representing 'the victim'! And the victim who had benefited from such contributions, subsequently indulged herself and was caught in evil attempts by and IN COLLUSION WITH the abductors of Justice; the attempts simply intended to cause damages or to discredit Andrew. Typical examples and by-products of the activities covered in the 'lessons to be learned from examples stated' in the Old Testament. Needless to say 'the victim' did declare herself to be an agnostic and atheist in line with many a LIPS member, all of whom proclaiming "out only for what each could get for him/her self". GREED ruling supreme.

Citizens' Alternative Precedents New Community On Line web-site. Read about a judge of two minds! A split personality or just an abuser of office generating pecuniary advantage through misconduct in public office for the legal circles the judge has affinity to? You read the transcript and of the fact that the judge acknowledged a settlement agreement WAS IMPOSED on the client by the solicitor and of the fact that when it came to issuing an order it was a case, allegedly, of NO UNDUE INFLUENCE by the solicitor on the client. Can the Lord Chancellor and Parliament justify maintaining such persons in judicial office? [*Link to the FACTS STATED & THE PLEADED VIOLATIONS / Legal Arguments as settled and lodged at the European Court of Human Rights, by Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights (NGO). The site was updated in October 2004]. 

The above Community On line member challenged the manipulative within the Civil Appeals Office. The explicit Appeal, we refer you to, arose out of fraudulent Divorce proceedings as published in our pages. Full disclosure, names, dates etc., for and in the Public Interest imminent. European Court Application on substantial grounds for the Community On Line member as in the above paragraph stated. Documented evidence covering 'the imposition of a consent agreement through blackmail, intimidation and threats' published at the above web-site.

Failures to protect the victims of crime, from criminals and from persons who negate in their public duties operating from within the confines of the Metropolitan Police and the courts' services, suggests more than negligence and downright connections with criminals. We have known of such persons who freely assert and boast that the police are in their palms. The combination of defaults and assertions lead any person (with one grain of grey matter in their skull) to surmise that the invisible services section of CIUKU Enterprises is flourishing unhindered; unchecked, as it is, care of the inherent rights, that are built into the appointment of Law Enforcement Agents who are set free to act in contempt of all law confirms the founder's conclusions, in 1972-75 and the words of Charles Louis Montesquieu.

9. FRAUD In The Legal System. The facts of life we cover in our pages were acknowledged by the Rt. Hon. Paul Boateng as long ago as 1995, following succinct submissions by Andrew Yiannides, the founder of *human-rights* to the Rt. Hon. Tony Blair, leader of New Labour, a government in waiting. ORGANISED CRIME and family matters fall within the duties of the Home Secretary and the Minister of State. The dishonest and the organised criminals within the legal/judicial/police (TRIAD) have been indulging in gross violations of a number of Articles of the ECoHR in pursuance of their dishonest goals; they did and do so as seasoned licensed criminals. We shall keep you informed because an explicit letter with attachments directed to the Home Office by the Prime Minister was then re-routed and delivered to the beehive of the corrupt and corrupters in our country, to some junior in the Lord Chancellor's department. UPDATE: 2002 we reported to the government the parts of a stooge who came along to abuse and waste Andrew's time as 'an alleged victim of the abused courts' facilities'. (*Link) UPDATE: 2003 we wrote an explicit letter to the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, ex Minister wherein we pointed out to the usual: "Shove it the trash can and ignore 'the serf, 'the shitizen', practices by public servants, Ministry staff and officials. In the very letter we pointed to evidence NO ONE COULD IGNORE because it was and it is published in the public domain, ON THE INTERNET. The Prime Minister acted and the overlord of the TRIAD (*Link to clarification) was replaced with a Minister FOR CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS who also doubles as the Justice Minister / Lord Chancellor. As soon as the letter was delivered to the MP the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett expressed his views in an explicit article that was published in the London Evening Standard. As an elected MP he was emphatic and very clear on the issues we have been pointing to for years. Abuse of the legal system and the courts, by the judges and the circles from within which the judges are 'selected through secret arrangements', between the criminals who are in control of the justice system and the courts' was the core element of our submissions to the MP (*Link).    

Sir John Stephens QPM. is called to note and state if it be the intention of his office to prosecute cases where the evidence is CRYSTAL CLEAR AND FULLY DOCUMENTED. Over to you, your Lordship and Sir John Stephens. We await your invitation to SEEK AFRESH FULL PARTICULARS through this world forum. The age of the secret and staged managed theatrical productions by the Law Enforcement Agency's IS OVER.

G. H. Scriven.  After the theatrical production at the Royal Courts of Justice in February 2000 we recognised that there was no possibility of his case and situation going back on keel. He had been dragged before the court for allegedly scandalising the judges and for allegedly being in contempt of a consent Order to which he had been blackmailed to submit. Following the imposed submission to pressures from the bench, who thus secured 'an allegedly legitimate consent order' an Early Day Motion was instigated by Members of the House of Commons. That E.D.M NEVER LED TO ANYTHING. Read the four quotes in our HomePage and recognise the scenario. Then read the extract from a letter by a solicitor to client (March 2003 *Link) and access ALL of the material in the left margin / window especially the images of article and letters published in the page you can link to from here).

Mr Scriven was appearing before the court to answer allegations founded on archaic law 'for scandalising the judges'. The newspaper reports, for weeks leading to that date in court clear as to the issues. In court Mr Scriven was faced with a Section 42 application, by the Attorney General! Mr Scriven had been provided with plenty of ammunition, by a team who worked hard to put together a binder full of newspaper reports and other documented evidence against a regular abuser of the courts' facilities. None of the evidence prepared was used at court and no reference was made to the situations covered in the mass of evidence. We shall be publishing evidence in due course covering the aforementioned FACTS. [*Link to submissions to an affiliate / associate of Mr G. H. Scriven, Mr Norman Scarth    

Home Office. Sir John Stephen QPM. and the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, our Home Secretary  are called upon to justify the vile activities of the police officers we shall name to them.  BOTH are hereby challenged to access the Summons we publish in our pages and both must apply their knowledge of 'The LAW' to the pleaded facts. They must JUSTIFY, if at all possible, the multitude of defaults and the activities of police officers AT ALL MATERIAL TIMES without loosing sight of the fact that cruelty and greed led to a loss of life, Andrew's niece. They must JUSTIFY THE SOCIETY THEIR SUBORDINATES ARE CREATING through misconduct in public office resting, founded and thriving on corrupt practices, not mere misfeasance as in the  R-v-Dytham case.  THIS IS THE AGE OF FREEDOM OF INFORMATION and 'The LAW' is 'The LAW'.   IGNORE IT NOT please.......

Magistrates Courts: Consider the Summons published by a targeted victim of the Housing Benefit constructive frauds enterprises, always instigated by Local Authority staff and officers. Consider also the affidavit published in the Local Authority pages covering attempts by solicitors to convert UNPAID Housing Benefit funds to alleged legal costs care of organised deceptions and false instruments as arranged by the dishonest from within Haringey Council. Needless to say Legal Aid certificates were also freely available to be used as 'loans' for theft facilities. The exhibit attached to the affidavit the link takes you to suffices. The Letter from the Legal Aid Board clear - the targeted landlady was no fool and she was prepared to challenge the abusers of the county court and Legal Aid Board free for all facilities to the legal circles - solicitors and barristers. Evidence will be published by the targeted victim at her web-site covering the background to the criminal indulgences that Local Authority staff engaged in through reliance that police and local county court judges would be ignoring it all.

MEDIA.   Time for our Ministers to tell the truth proclaimed the editorial on 6th November 1998 in the Daily Mail, the banner bearer for the much tested Lawrence family. We made submissions to the editor over a long period and we merited no response, ever.  We repeated ourselves on the very day that Paul Johnson was declaring 'Corrupt Britain' and went on to assert that Labour was ..... The fact is that Labour has at least been acting as promised before they won a landslide victory and formed a new government of vision and conscious. The next test is to ensure the resolve, stated in 1995, is not hindered and that the government does not waver. The media barons and their editors must play their part in the creation of a truly informed electorate. Time for changes and true democracy.

Norman Scarth (name links to original pages) Received a six year prison sentence, last year. We keep hearing on the grapevine that he was/is due to make an appearance in court for an appeal. However, we have had no confirmation from any source on the issue. He set up his own domain in June 2000 and he even wrote to a prisoner of the value of the Internet as the vehicle through which to impart information to the average citizen, those that he himself had determined should remain in the dark - as his own defaults to publish anything established because of his other interests. He never did anything towards that goal for almost a year! We were called upon to witness the last week of the trial last April (2001). We observed enough theatre and noted many a default. We undertook to assist in the creation and the publication of a web-site through which to state the facts of the case against him and the trial after the judge failed to cause to be produced to the jury any of the facsimile transmissions (FAX) that Mr Scarth had been caused to sent to one and all after the assault he was subjected to, by the police, in August 1999. Copy of a Fax and copy of a letter we sent to the editor of the Daily Express (among others) at the time (20th September 1999) we published in the web-site that was set-up to deal with the facts of his case. We were caused to abandon work on the site because Mr Scarth failed to adhere to his agreement with us. We were denied access to the transcripts of the trial as his colleagues in Bradford arranged, in breach of the existing agreement.

OBSTRUCTIONS to Rights In Law. Sites to visit: (1* CoA staff)

POLICE TRUE TO FORM the police systematically fail to prosecute criminals ( Link 1 ) who indulge at the expense of 'targeted' third parties ( Link 2 ). The police intentionally default to act within the remit of their retainers and with intent promote falsehoods in order to further damage the victims they target on orders ( Link 3 ). The endorsement of blatant acts of theft of properties and rights in law (through false instruments ( Link 4 ) generated by public servants ( Link 5 ) ). AND THE CONTINUE TO DEFAULT irrespective of the fact that CRIME IS NOT STATUTE BARRED. In the society they have been been let loose to create unhindered and unchallenged blunt promotion and endorsement of crime.  Breaches of the Criminal Justice Act 1988  IS THEIR GAME. Through their inhuman and SADISTIC activities the TRIAD rules supreme care of other public servants. We point out to the relevant provisions covering Torment and Torture to which the Lawrence Family have been subjected by the very same circles and criminals. The succinct provisions of the aforesaid Act of Parliament qualifies and justifies our stance.

Police Complaints Authority  the capabilities of persons appointed to serve the public will  be challenged in due course. They are of opinion that they can advance any RECKLESS presentation from the police, the corrupters of our society, as an alleged investigation proper, typified in the page / file we link you to ( Link ). The police default in the execution of their public duties, WITH INTENT, and the police subsequently, block investigations with the blessings of the PCA.

The chairman of the PCA is called upon to download 'The Breeding Grounds - case' and 'The Police Summons the Victim'. We look to the PCA to come forward with some logical explanation as to the practices of the public servants the cases cover. The FAILURES OF THE PCA to act in cases that were referred to the PCA, as we publish in our pages ARE MORE THAN SUSPECT. Just another dud-front blowing dust in the eyes of the victims of rampant institutionalised crime. The part of the police and the PCA in the break up of families WITH INTENT, will be made public in due course. For the time being we refer you to the facts we publish arising out of THE POLICE FALSIFY THEIR RECORDS AND USE FORGERIES WITH INTENT. ( Link 1 ) ( Link 2 ) ( Link 3 )

The PCA failed and fails to produce to the victims, copy of the report by the 'amenable cover-up agent'  who took over from Chief Inspector L P Harris. Any report allegedly presented to the Authority by the amenable 'cover-up agent'. We wish to publish it if it exists, pursuant to Our Aims; it has not been forthcoming. The PCA Chairman was asked to cease advancing unjustified and inexcusable rulings by allegedly 'impartial judicial chair occupants' who act  as Godfathers for all criminals in the public services.

WE made it clear to the chairman of the PCA and we emphasise through these pages that WE ARE NOT AT WAR. National security is not at risk BUT NATIONAL DISGRACE IS.  Abandon the vile 'justifications of old'. Do justice to Parliament and to 'The LAW'. The world at large awaits your responses and honourable actions.  Cease all evasive tactics. ACT RESPONSIBLY and within 'The LAW'.  Abandon the production and dissemination of ALL FALSE INSTRUMENTS lacking accountability by the authors.

'The LAW' is 'The LAW'. NO DISCRIMINATION ON ANY GROUNDS as provided for under article 14 of the ECoHR. Yet those events somehow indicated the preferential treatment afforded to persons who generate income for the legal circles, albeit even illegally and quite often with criminal intent. THE FORGERIES and FALSE INSTRUMENTS (court orders lacking accountability by the authors) used in the promotion of the constructive frauds on targeted citizens as with private landlords in the Housing Benefit misappropriation and thefts, free for all, scandal.